Doe et al v. Woodard et al
| Jane Doe and I B |
| April Woodard, Amanda Albert, Christina Newbill, Krystal Grint, Marian Percy, Shirley Rhodus, Chris Garvin, Richard Bengtsson, Jeff Greene, Reggie Bicha, El Paso County Department of Human Services and El Paso County Board of County Commissioners |
| 1:2015cv01165 |
| June 3, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| El Paso |
| Kristen L. Mix |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
46
ORDER; 44 Defendants' Joint Motion to Stay Discovery: Unopposed is GRANTED. This case is STAYED pending further order of the Court, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 9/16/15.(morti, )
|
|
Filing
38
MINUTE ORDER; 32 County Defendants' Motion to Stay Discovery is DENIED as moot and the 37 County Defendants' Amended Motion to Stay Discovery: Unopposed is DENIED without prejudice, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 8/24/15.(morti, )
|
|
Filing
36
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 8/21/15. County Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) # 31 is DENIED as moot. (lgale, )
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 7/20/15. Motion to Proceed Anonymously by Doe Plaintiffs # 2 is DENIED as moot. Amended Unopposed Motion to Proceed Anonymously by Doe Plaintiff # 27 is GRANTED.(lgale, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
