Hart et al v. UPS Freight
Plaintiff: Joseph R. Hart and Kendall S. Palmer
Defendant: UPS Freight
Case Number: 1:2015cv01441
Filed: July 8, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Arapahoe
Presiding Judge: Richard P. Matsch
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 19, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER granting 33 Defendant's motion for summary judgment as to all claims of Plaintiff Joseph R. Hart. The clerk shall enter judgment dismissing the claims of plaintiff Joseph R. Hart with an award of costs to the defendant, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 7/19/17. (ktera)
March 16, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 22 PROTECTIVE ORDER filed by Defendant UPS Freight, Inc., by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 3/16/16. (ktera)
October 22, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER Pursuant to Procedural Order Number One 12 entered by this Court, a scheduling conference will be held on December 3, 2015, at 2:00 p.m. in the Conference Room, Second Floor, the Byron White United States Courthouse, 1823 Stout Street, D enver, Colorado. The proposed order (original only) on paper, shall be submitted directly to chambers by 4:00 p.m. on November 23, 2015. The conference is conducted with lead counsel present in person. No parties or representatives of parties will be permitted to attend, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 10/22/15. (ktera)
September 24, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER Granting 14 the Unopposed Motion to Amend the Complaint and the First amended Complaint tendered as Document 13 is accepted for filing, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 9/24/2015.(evana, )
August 25, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 12 PROCEDURAL ORDER NUMBER ONE counsel will meet and confer as required by Rule 26 (f)(2) within 30 days from the date of this order. Lead counsel shall attend the conference in person. The disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1)(A) shall be made within 14 days after that conference. The proposed discovery plan will be in the form of the Scheduling Order which will be submitted to chambers in paper form 10 days before the date of the Scheduling Conference. Counsel for the plaintiff will telephon e chambers within 10 days after the disclosures to set a date and time for a Scheduling Conference pursuant to Rule 16. The instructions for preparation of the Scheduling Order and the form of that order are found at http://www.cod.uscourts.gov/judges/judges.aspx by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 8/25/2015. (evana, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hart et al v. UPS Freight
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joseph R. Hart
Represented By: John W. McKendree
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kendall S. Palmer
Represented By: John W. McKendree
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UPS Freight
Represented By: Micah David Dawson
Represented By: Steven M. Gutierrez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?