<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/xsl/rss2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Garcia v. Waken et al :: Justia Dockets &amp; Filings</title>
        <link>https://dockets.justia.com/docket/colorado/codce/1:2016cv01977/164913</link>
        <atom:link href="https://dockets.justia.com/docket/colorado/codce/1:2016cv01977/164913/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 04:09:42 -0700</pubDate>
        <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 04:09:42 -0700</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Justia Dockets &amp; Filings</generator>
        <copyright>Copyright 2026 Justia Inc</copyright>
        <description>Garcia v. Waken et al - Case Documents</description>
             
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 89]]>
                    </title>
                    <link>
                https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/colorado/codce/1:2016cv01977/164913/89
            </link>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                ORDER by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 3/31/2022, re: 75 Plaintiff&#039;s Motion to Not Consent to Magistrate is DENIED; 76 Plaintiff&#039;s Objection to Magistrate Judge&#039;s Order is OVERRULED; 78 the Recommendation of Un ited States Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang is ACCEPTED. ORDERED that plaintiff is prohibited from filing any papers in this case unless such papers are filed by a licensed attorney admitted to practice in the District of Colorado who is representing plaintiff. ORDERED that plaintiff&#039;s Motion to Re[-]Open Case [Docket No. 80] is DENIED. ORDERED that plaintiff&#039;s Objection to Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang Received August 9, 2021 For Review by District Court [Docket No. 81] is OVERRULED. ORDERED that plaintiff&#039;s Motion to Object to refer case to Magistrate [Docket No. 82] is DENIED.. (sphil, )
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid>
                https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/colorado/codce/1:2016cv01977/164913/89
            </guid>
                <pubDate>
            Thu, 31 Mar 2022 00:00:00 -0700
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 53]]>
                    </title>
                    <link>
                https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/colorado/codce/1:2016cv01977/164913/53
            </link>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                ORDER granting 32 Defendants Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Complaint by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 09/25/2017. Plaintiff&#039;s third, fourth, fifth, and sixth claims for relief are dismissed without prejudice. Defendants Adams County, Colorado, Sheriff Michael McIntosh, and Matthew Marquez are dismissed (sphil, )
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid>
                https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/colorado/codce/1:2016cv01977/164913/53
            </guid>
                <pubDate>
            Mon, 25 Sep 2017 00:00:00 -0700
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 43]]>
                    </title>
                    <link>
                https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/colorado/codce/1:2016cv01977/164913/43
            </link>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 3/8/17. Defendants "Adams County, Colorado," Adams County Sheriff&#039;s Office, Adam County Sheriff Michael McIntosh, and Detective Matthew Marquez&#039;s Motion for a Parti al Stay on Discovery 34 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; Discovery in this matter as to Plaintiff&#039;s claims against Defendants Adams County, Adams County Sheriff&#039;s Office and McIntosh is STAYED pending the resolution of their pending motion to dismiss 32 ; All other discovery in this matter, including as to Plaintiff&#039;s claims against Defendant Marquez, MAY PROCEED; and Within three (3) business days of the disposition of the pending Motion to Dismiss,... the Parties will CONTACT the chambers of Magistrate Judge Wang to schedule a status conference to discuss further discovery. (bwilk, )
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid>
                https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/colorado/codce/1:2016cv01977/164913/43
            </guid>
                <pubDate>
            Wed, 08 Mar 2017 00:00:00 -0800
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                </channel>
</rss>
