Tso v. Murray
| Gilbert T. Tso |
| Rebecca Murray, Tanya Akins, Tanya (I) Akins, Sherr Puttmann Akins Lamb PC, Jeannie Ridings, Jeannie (I) Ridings, Kililis Ridings & Vanau PC, Russell (I) M. Murray, Dena (I) Murray, Joanne (I) Jensen, David P. Brodsky, David (I) P. Brodsky, Elizabeth A. Starrs, Elizabeth (I) A. Starrs, Charles D. Johnson, Charles (I) D. Johnson, Ross B.H. Buchanan, Ross (I) B.H. Buchanan, David H. Goldberg, David (I) H. Goldberg, County of Lake, The, Illinois, State of Illinois, The, Mitch McKee, Monica Jackson, Monica (I) Jackson, Lara Delka, Lara (I) Delka, City & County of Denver, Colorado, and State of Colorado, The |
| 1:2016cv02480 |
| October 3, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Denver |
| William J. Martinez |
| Craig B. Shaffer |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
308
ORDER Denying 295 Motion for Reconsideration, by Judge William J. Martinez on 2/20/2019. (angar, )
|
|
Filing
282
ORDER Adopting 237 Recommendations of Magistrate Judge Granting Defendants' Motions to Dismiss and Dismissing Plaintiff's Claims. Plaintiff's Amended Written Objection to the Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommendati ons (ECF No. 259 ) is OVERRULED; The Murray Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 135 ) is GRANTED; The Denver Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 137 ) is GRANTED; The Colorado Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 139 ) i s GRANTED; The SPAL Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 141 ) is GRANTED; The Illinois Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 142 ) is GRANTED; Dr. Spiegle's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 186 ) is GRANTED; Plaintiff's Object ion and Motion for Court Review of Magistrate Judge's Order to Supplement (ECF NO. 170 ), reviewed as an Objection under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) to Judge Shaffer's Order (ECF No. 169 ) denying Plaintiff's Verified Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Complaint (ECF No. 163 ), is OVERRULED as futile. ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 2/28/2018. (angar, )
|
|
Filing
272
ORDER denying 268 Plaintiffs Complaint re: ECF #135 Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(b)(3) and 11(b)(4) and Motion for Sanctions and DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Defendants request for their reasonable expenses, including attorneys fees and costs, incurred in responding to the Motion, by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 2/1/2018. (jgonz, )
|
|
Filing
207
ORDER Overruling Objections Pursuant to Fed. R. CIV. P. 72(a). Judge Shaffer's Order (ECF No. 168 ) is AFFIRMED and Plaintiffs Motion (ECF No. 190 ) is OVERRULED. ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 08/09/2017. (angar, )
|
|
Filing
182
ORDER Denying Preliminary Injunction and Temporary Restraining Order. "Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Order to Show Cause Why a Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue" (ECF No. 131 ) is DENIED; "Emergency Motion for Court Review of ECF # 131 and # 132 and to GRANT TRO Instanter" (ECF No. 181 ) is GRANTED to the extent the Court has now provided the review requested, but is in all other respects DENIED; "Colorado Defendants' and Denver Defendants' Joint Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Verified Complaint for Emergency Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (ECF No. 164 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, as set forth above; The Motion by Defendants Rebecca Murray, et al. for Joinder in ECF No. 164 (ECF No. 173 ) is GRANTED by Judge William J. Martinez on 07/21/2017. (angar, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
