Costilla v. Hall & Ludlam, PLLC
Plaintiff: David Costilla
Defendant: Hall & Ludlam, PLLC
Case Number: 1:2016cv02670
Filed: October 28, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: El Paso
Presiding Judge: Craig B. Shaffer
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 15, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER re 9 Motion to Dismiss. The court concludes that it lacks personal jurisdiction over the Defendant. Consequently, the Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED and this case is dismissed without prejudice. By Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 6/15/2017. (cbslc2)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Costilla v. Hall & Ludlam, PLLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Costilla
Represented By: David Michael Marco
Represented By: Larry Paul Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hall & Ludlam, PLLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?