Gas Products Corporation v. BTU Marketing LLC et al
| Gas Products Corporation |
| BTU Marketing LLC and Montigo Del Ray Corporation |
| 1:2016cv02747 |
| November 9, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Mesa |
| Michael E. Hegarty |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 42 Motion for Summary Judgment as to All Claims in this Case by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 09/22/2017. The Court holds that GPCs remaining three claims are not time barred. Additionally, di sputed issues of material fact exist on each of the claims. Because GPC does not provide admissible evidence supporting its theory that Defendants interfered with its prospective contractual relationships by disclosing GPCs credit issues to its cus tomers, the Court grants summary judgment on this theory. The Court grants summary judgment for Montigo on its breach of contract claim, because GPC does not rebut Montigos evidence establishing the counterclaim. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Montigo in the sum of $9,583.39. The Court defers execution of this judgment until a final judgment is rendered on GPCs affirmative claims. Additionally, because Montigo pleaded its unjust enrichment claim in the alternative, the Court dismisses that claim as moot. (mdave, )
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 30 Defendants Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Complaint for Failure to State a Claim Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 12(b)(6) by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 02/07/2017. Because Plaintiff does not allege that Defendants conduct caused a third party to breach an existing contract, the Court dismisses Plaintiffs third cause of action. (mdave, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
