Pollack et al v. Boulder County et al
| Reid Pollack and Some of All Books, LLC |
| Boulder County, Polly Miller, Polly (I) Miller, Steve Kellison, Steve (I) Kellison, Matt Sanderson, Matt (I) Sanderson, Robinson and (I) Robinson |
| 1:2017cv02444 |
| October 11, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Boulder |
| Gordon P. Gallagher |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
108
ORDER granting 98 Motion for Summary Judgment by Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 6/9/20.(pglov)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER Adopting 66 February 13, 2019 Recommendation of United Sates Magistrate Judge. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 24 ) is GRANTED, and all claims asserted in Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Doc. # 15 ) are DISMISSED WITH PREJU DICE. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend the Complaint (Doc. # 59 ) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The Motion is DENIED with respect to Plaintiff's proposed "failure to adopt a policy" claim and the Motion is G RANTED with respect to Plaintiff's proposed malicious prosecution and judicial deception claims. Plaintiff shall have up to and including 4/21/2019, to file an Amended Complaint. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 03/21/2019. (athom, )
|
|
Filing
66
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter on 2/13/19 as to 59 First MOTION for Leave to amend filed by Reid Pollack, 24 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Steve Kellison, Steve (I) Kelli son, Polly (I) Miller, Polly Miller, Boulder County. IT IS RECOMMENDED that Defendants Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint (Dkt. #24) be GRANTED, and that Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Amend the Complaint (Dkt. #59) be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part - GRANTED to allow him to amend his complaint to assert claims for judicial deception and malicious prosecution in relation to his July 25, 2014 arrest, and DENIED in all other respects.. (nmarb, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
