Eco-Site LLC et al v. County of Pueblo, Colorado
| Eco-Site LLC and T-Mobile West LLC |
| County of Pueblo, Colorado |
| 1:2017cv02535 |
| October 23, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Scott T. Varholak |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 0332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
135
ORDER ON RENEWED CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Plaintiff T-Mobile's Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment in Cases 17-cv-02535-CMA-STV and 17-02862- CMA-STV (Doc. # 108 ) is GRANTED; Defendant Pueblo County's Re-Filed Combined Motio n for Summary Judgment in Cases 17-cv-02535-CMA-STV and 17- 02862-CMA-STV Following Order on Cross Motions for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 113 ) is DENIED. Summary judgment is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiffs in Civil Action No. 17-cv-02535-CMA- STV. The following motions are DENIED AS MOOT: Plaintiff Eco-Site's Motion for Summary Judgment and Rule 106 Opening Brief (Doc. # 65 ); Plaintiff T-Mobile's Rule 702 Motion to Exclude Reports and Testimony of Lee Afflerbach in Cases 17-cv-02535-CMA-STV and 17-02862-CMA-STV (Doc. # 110 ); and the Parties' Joint Motion to Request Telephonic Status Conference in Advance of Final Trial Preparation Conference (Doc. # 134 ); the Final Trial Preparation Conference and Bench Trial in this matter are hereby VACATED; and the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiffs in Civil Action No. 17-cv-02535-CMA-STV and close this case, by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 6/25/2020. (evana, )
|
|
Filing
104
ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. That Defendant Pueblo County's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 64 ) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The Motion is GRANTED as to the legal standard that should apply to Plai ntiffs' Section 332 claims. The Court declines to apply the FCC's Declaratory Ruling retroactively and will instead apply the least intrusive means standard from AT&T Mobility Servs., LLC v. Vill. of Corrales, 642 F. App'x 886 (10th Cir. 2016). The remainder of the Motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. That Plaintiff Eco-Site's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 65 ) and Plaintiff T-Mobile's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 66 ) are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 12/23/2019.(evana, )
|
|
Filing
95
ORDER Granting in part and Denying in part 88 Plaintiffs' Motion for Oral Argument. (Doc. # 88 .) It will hear oral argument on the effect of the Declaratory Ruling but not on the factual record of this dispute. It is FURTHER ORDERED that within five (5) business days of the date of this Order, the parties shall confer and have one attorney email the Court (Arguello_chambers@cod.uscourts.gov) with proposed dates and times at which all parties are available for oral argument. The Court will set aside two hours for oral argument, by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 5/29/2019.(evana, )
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER Affirming United States Magistrate Judge's 36 Order Granting Intervenor Defendant Sam Brown's Motion to Intervene and Overruling Plaintiff T-Mobile's 38 Objection. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 10/29/2018. (athom, )
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER Granting Defendant's 19 Motion to Consolidate Cases. The Court consolidates the following actions for all purposes: (1) 17-cv-02535-CMA-STV (the instant action, Eco-Site I), and (2) 17-cv-02862-MJW (Eco-Site II). All subsequent filin gs in either of these actions shall be docketed under Case No. 17-cv-02535-CMA-STV and captioned as set forth above. The Court's previous Order Granting the Joint Motion to Stay the instant action (Doc. # 23 ) is hereby vacated. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 04/09/2018. (athom, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
