Malcolm v. Reynolds Polymer Technology, Inc.
| Steven Malcolm |
| Reynolds Polymer Technology, Inc. |
| 1:2017cv02835 |
| November 27, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| XX Outside US |
| Kristen L. Mix |
| Contract Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
98
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 08/23/19 GRANTING 70 Motion for Issuance of Issuance of Letters of Request. It is further ORDERED that The United States District Court for the District of Colorado respectfully requests the assistance of the Court of Session, Scotland in obtaining the trial evidence sought from HT Systems (UK) Ltd, a company registered in Scotland with company number SC199388 having its registered office at 53 High Street, Dumbarton, Glasgow, G82 1LS doing busines s in Scotland, as specified in Exhibit A [#70-1]. The documents identified in Exhibit A [#70-1] are necessary for the purposes of justice and for the due determination of the matters in dispute between the parties. It is necessary for the purposes of justice and for the due determination of the matters in dispute between the parties that the Court of Session, Scotland cause the following business entity, which is a company within the Scottish jurisdiction, to produce documents for trial. The nam e and registered office of the company is as follows: HT Systems (UK) Ltd, 53 High Street, Dumbarton, Glasgow, G82 1LSThe company also trades as HTS and has a place of business at 68 Whirlow Road,Ballieston, Glasgow, G69 6QE. The United States Distri ct Court for the District of Colorado respectfully requests the Court of Session, Scotland make an order for the recovery of the particular documents in Exhibit A [#70-1] according to your usual and proper processes. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, to the extent that documents listed in Exhibit A [#70-1] are produced by HT Systems, Defendants may re-depose Mr. Fraser for no more than two hours.(nmarb, )
|
|
Filing
97
ORDER granting 83 Unopposed Motion for Issuance of Letters of Request to AFP by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 8/22/2019.(jgonz, )
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER by Judge William J. Martinez on 12/20/2018, re: 33 ATM's Motion to Intervene is GRANTED; 48 ATM'S Motion for Oral Argument is DENIED AS MOOT. ATM's proposed Answer (ECF No. 33-1) is ACCEPTED AS FILED. The Clerk shall docket the proposed Answer as a separate filing on CM/ECF; and The Clerk and parties shall amend the caption of this case to reflect that AcrylicTank Manufacturing, Inc., is an Intervenor-Defendant in this action. (sphil, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Malcolm v. Reynolds Polymer Technology, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Steven Malcolm | |
| Represented By: | Jeri Jean Wettestad |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Reynolds Polymer Technology, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
