Pittman v. Fox
Darnell Pittman |
Jack Fox |
1:2017cv02842 |
November 27, 2017 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Fremont |
Gordon P. Gallagher |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 23 ORDER Denying 1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus; Denying 19 Applicant's Request for Leave to File Supplemental Pleading; Denying 20 Applicant's Motion for Reconsideration for an Extension of Time; Denying as Moot 22 Respondent's Motion to Supplement Response. Case is DISMISSED, by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 4/18/2018. (swest, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Pittman v. Fox | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Darnell Pittman | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Jack Fox | |
Represented By: | J. B. Garcia(Designation Federal Agency Attorney) |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.