Oppenheimer v. Affinity Classics, L.L.C.

Plaintiff: David Oppenheimer
Defendant: Affinity Classics, L.L.C.
Case Number: 1:2018cv00359
Filed: February 13, 2018
Court: Colorado District Court
Office: Denver Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Raymond P. Moore
Referring Judge: Scott T. Varholak
Nature of Suit: Copyrights
Cause of Action: 17:504
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 8, 2018 18 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 16 Plaintiffs Motion for Alternate Service to Serve Defendant. Status Conference set for 6/6/2018 is VACATED and RESET to 7/3/2018 10:00 AM in Courtroom C203 before Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak, by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 5/8/2018. (jgonz, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Oppenheimer v. Affinity Classics, L.L.C.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Oppenheimer
Represented By: John Allan Arsenault
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Affinity Classics, L.L.C.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?