Mohror v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., The
Plaintiff: Betty Mohror
Defendant: Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., The
Case Number: 1:2018cv01852
Filed: July 20, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Mesa
Presiding Judge: Gordon P Gallagher
Referring Judge: Michael E Hegarty
2 Judge: Raymond P Moore
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 in
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 6, 2018 Filing 21 CERTIFICATE of Service by email by Clerk of Court to mesa.court@judicial.state.co.us. Text Only Entry. (cpear)
September 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER: In light of the stipulation, the Court REMANDS this action to the District Court for the County of Mesa, Colorado. Entered by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 9/6/2018. (cpear)
August 23, 2018 Filing 19 STIPULATION to Remand Case to Colorado District Court by Plaintiff Betty Mohror. (Azbell, Joseph)
August 23, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER: The Scheduling Conference set for 8/28/2018 with Magistrate Judge Hegarty is hereby VACATED. By Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on August 23, 2018. Text Only Entry (gpgsec )
August 22, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER REASSIGNING MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to D.C. Colo. L. Civ. R. 40.1(a), and as approved by the Chief Judge of the Court, the undersigned directs that the Clerk of the Court reassign this action to Magistrate Judge Gallagher as the referral judge. All further pleadings in this case shall reflect the case number of 18-cv-01852-RM-GPG. ORDERED by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 8/22/2018. (cthom, )
August 21, 2018 Filing 16 Proposed Scheduling Order by Plaintiff Betty Mohror. (Azbell, Joseph)
August 9, 2018 Filing 15 MOTION to Remand to State Court Because Defendant's Notice of Removal was Untimely by Plaintiff Betty Mohror. (Azbell, Joseph)
August 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MINUTE ORDER: With the assignment of this matter, the parties are advised that throughout this case they are expected to be familiar and comply with not only the Local Rules of this District, but also Judge Raymond P. Moore's Civil Practice Standards, which may be found at: http://www.cod.uscourts.gov/JudicialOfficers/ActiveArticleIIIJudges/HonRaymondPMoore.aspx. SO ORDERED by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 8/9/2018. (Text Only Entry) (rmsec )
August 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct a pretrial conference and enter a pretrial order, and (5) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions. Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the parties by motion, this court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. Entered by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 8/9/2018. (Text Only Entry) (rmsec )
August 9, 2018 Filing 12 CASE REASSIGNED pursuant to #10 Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. All parties do not consent. This case is randomly reassigned to Judge Raymond P. Moore. All future pleadings should be designated as 18-cv-01852-RM. (Text Only Entry) (tsher, )
August 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER re: #10 Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge filed by Betty Mohror by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 8/9/2018. Parties do not consent. The Court directs the Clerk of the Court to reassign this case underD.C. Colo. LCivR 40.1(a) (tsher, )
August 8, 2018 Filing 10 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Plaintiff Betty Mohror All parties do not consent.. (Azbell, Joseph)
July 25, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 7/25/2018. Consent Form due by 8/17/2018. (tsher, )
July 24, 2018 Filing 8 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Joseph Henry Azbell on behalf of Betty MohrorAttorney Joseph Henry Azbell added to party Betty Mohror(pty:pla) (Azbell, Joseph)
July 23, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 07/23/2018. Scheduling Conference set for 8/28/2018 10:30 AM in Courtroom A 501 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. (mdave, )
July 20, 2018 Filing 6 FIRST AND FINAL NOTICE TO ALL ATTORNEY(S) AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES IN REMOVED, TRANSFERRED, OR OTHER CASES. To receive any further notice in a case removed or transferred to this court, or special matters including discovery disputes, bankruptcy appeals, or withdrawls of reference, Multi-district litigation (MDL), etc., all attorneys and unrepresented parties must enter an appearance under D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(a). An attorney must be an active member of this court's bar and be in good standing in accordance with D.C.COLO.LAttyR 3. A waiver of the fee for bar admission may apply in limited situations. (rroge, )
July 20, 2018 Filing 5 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (rroge, )
July 20, 2018 Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Text Only Entry. (rroge, )
July 20, 2018 Filing 3 Administrative Notice: Notice to filer of non-compliance with Notice of Removal case opening procedures. It is the responsibility of the attorney or pro se party removing the case to follow Local Rule D.C.COLO.LCivR 81.1, and 28 U.S.C. 1446(a). See Appendix B Notice of Removal, in the User Guide - Attorney Case Opening Procedures document. (Text Only Entry) (rroge, )
July 20, 2018 Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent The Home Depot, Inc. for Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.. (Smith, Arthur)
July 20, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. from District Court, Mesa County, Colorado, Case Number 2018CV030208. (Filing fee $ 400, Receipt Number 1082-6207262), filed by Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B-1 to B-13, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Smith, Arthur)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mohror v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., The
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., The
Represented By: Arthur Kittredge Smith, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Betty Mohror
Represented By: Joseph Henry Azbell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?