Harlas v. Barn LLC, The
| Linda Harlas |
| M&R Enterprises LLC, Barn LLC, The, Catherine Haigh and M and R Enterprises, LLC |
| 1:2018cv02320 |
| September 11, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Wiley Y Daniel |
| Nina Y Wang |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
MINUTE ORDER: Due to an unavoidable scheduling conflict with the court's calendar, the Scheduling Conference currently set for for 11/27/2018 10:30 AM is RESET IN TIME ONLY to 9:00 AM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. By Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 11/06/2018. Text Only Entry (nywlc1, )
|
| Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint,,, by Barn LLC, The, Catherine Haigh, M and R Enterprises, LLC.(Wells, Robert) |
|
Filing 9
MINUTE ORDER: In light of the parties' Stipulation at #8 , the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to CORRECT the caption in this case by replacing "M&R Enterprises, LLC" with "M and R Enterprises, LLC". An answer or other responsive pleading is due on or before October 26, 2018. By Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 10/09/2018. Text Only Entry (nywlc1, )
|
| Filing 8 STIPULATION by Defendants Barn LLC, The, Catherine Haigh, M&R Enterprises LLC. (Wells, Robert) Modified on 10/9/2018 to add gavel pursuant to direction from the Chambers of Magistrate Judge Wang. (nmarb, ). |
|
Filing 7
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING/PLANNING CONFERENCE AND SETTING DEADLINE FOR FILING OF CONSENT/NONCONSENT FORM by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 9/17/2018. A Scheduling Conference is set for 11/27/2018 10:30 AM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. The parties or their counsel shall submit their proposed scheduling order, including a copy of the proposed scheduling order in a Word format sent via email to Wang_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov, on or before 11/20/2018. The parties shall complete and file the Consent/Nonconsent Form by 11/13/2018. (bwilk, )
|
| Filing 6 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (rkeec) |
| Filing 5 CASE REASSIGNED pursuant to #4 Memorandum Returning Case. This case is randomly reassigned to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. All future pleadings should be designated as 18-cv-02320-NYW. (Text Only Entry) (rkeec) |
| Filing 4 MEMORANDUM RETURNING CASE by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel. (rkeec) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (dbera, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Wiley Y. Daniel and drawn to Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter. Text Only Entry (dbera, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CATHERINE HAIGH, M&R ENTERPRISES LLC, THE BARN LLC (Filing fee $ 400,Receipt Number 1082-6289198)Attorney Collin Joseph Earl added to party LINDA HARLAS(pty:pla), filed by LINDA HARLAS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons M&R, #3 Summons THE BARN, #4 Exhibit 1, #5 Exhibit 2, #6 Exhibit 3, #7 Exhibit 4, #8 Exhibit 5, #9 Exhibit 6, #10 Exhibit 7, #11 Exhibit 8, #12 Exhibit 9, #13 Exhibit 10, #14 Exhibit 11, #15 Exhibit 12, #16 Exhibit 13, #17 Exhibit 14, #18 Exhibit 15, #19 Exhibit 16, #20 Exhibit 17, #21 Exhibit 18, #22 Exhibit 19, #23 Exhibit 20, #24 Exhibit 21, #25 Exhibit 22, #26 Exhibit 23, #27 Exhibit 24)(Earl, Collin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
