Hooks v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
| Arthur Hooks |
| Commissioner of Social Security and Commissioner, Social Security Administration |
| USAO-SS-Noticing and SSA Noticing |
| 1:2018cv02399 |
| September 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Lewis T Babcock |
| Gordon P Gallagher |
| Social Security - SSID Title XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER Dismissing Case. The clerk of the Court file in civil action number 18-cv-01889 a copy of the Complaint for Judicial Review of Social Security Decision (ECF No. #1 ) and the Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form) (ECF No. #3 ) filed in this action, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 9/21/2018. (angar, )
|
| Filing 3 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. by Plaintiff Arthur Hooks. (dbera, ) (dbera, ). Modified to correct docket on 9/20/2018 (dbera, ). |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry (dbera, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT For Judicial Review of Social Security Decision against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Arthur Hooks. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dbera, )Modified to correct docket on 9/20/2018 (dbera, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
