Cannell v. Bressan et al
Aaron Cannell |
Bressan and Joe Morales |
1:2018cv02510 |
October 1, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Lewis T Babcock |
Gordon P Gallagher |
Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. not a defendant) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 JUDGMENT by Clerk re: #6 Order of Dismissal. (agarc, ) |
Filing 6 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. The Prisoner Complaint and this action are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to the rule of Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994). IFP on appeal is denied, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 11/14/2018. (agarc, ) |
Filing 5 ORDER to Show Cause. This action will be dismissed without further notice if Mr. Cannell fails to show cause as directed within the time allowed, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 10/4/2018. (angar, ) |
Filing 4 ORDER Granting #3 Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 10/3/2018. (angar, ) |
Filing 3 Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. by Plaintiff Aaron Cannell. (rsams, ) |
Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry. (rsams, ) |
Filing 1 Prisoner COMPLAINT against Bressan, Joe Morales, filed by Aaron Cannell. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(rsams, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.