Eldridge v. Matevansian
| Clinton T. Eldridge |
| Matevansian |
| 1:2019cv00312 |
| February 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Lewis T Babcock |
| Gordon P Gallagher |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 JUDGMENT by Clerk re: #10 ORDER OF DISMISSAL on 3/26/2019. (sphil, ) |
Filing 10
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. The APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2241 #1 is denied and this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. No certificate of appealability will issue. IFP on appeal is denied, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 3/26/2019. (sphil, )
|
| Filing 9 PRELIMINARY RESPONSE to #1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Matevansian. (Attachments: #1 Trujillo Declaration, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Matevousian Declaration, #7 Attachment 1)(Bobet, Jane) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Jane Elizabeth Bobet on behalf of MatevansianAttorney Jane Elizabeth Bobet added to party Matevansian(pty:res) (Bobet, Jane) |
| Filing 7 Return of Service Receipt upon the United States Attorney General, re: #1 APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2241 on 02/20/2019. (sphil, ) Modified on 2/21/2019 to add docket text. (sphil, ). |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of Service by Clerk of Court re #1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus, and #5 Order to File Preliminary Response for Service of Process. (Attachments: #1 USPS Certified Mail Receipt) (rvill, ) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER to File Preliminary Response. Within twenty-one (21) days from the date of this Order Respondent shall file a Preliminary Response that complies with this Order, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 2/6/2019. (sphil, )
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 2/4/2019, re: #3 Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 in a Habeas Corpus Action is GRANTED. (sphil, )
|
| Filing 3 Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 in a Habeas Corpus Action by Petitioner Clinton T. Eldridge. (rvill, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry. (rvill, ) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2241, filed by Clinton T. Eldridge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(rvill, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Eldridge v. Matevansian | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Clinton T. Eldridge | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Matevansian | |
| Represented By: | Jane Elizabeth Bobet |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
