Frick v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
Brenda Frick |
American Family Mutual Insurance Company |
1:2019cv00459 |
February 15, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
S Kato Crews |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 Defendant's ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by American Family Mutual Insurance Company.(Johnson, Katie) |
Filing 9 ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond. For good cause shown, the Motion is GRANTED. American Family Mutual Insurance Company answer is due 3/27/2019. SO ORDERED, by Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews on 3/13/2019. Text Only Entry (skclc2, ) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Debra K. Sutton on behalf of American Family Mutual Insurance CompanyAttorney Debra K. Sutton added to party American Family Mutual Insurance Company(pty:dft) (Sutton, Debra) |
Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Defendant American Family Mutual Insurance Company. (Johnson, Katie) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Katie Berit Johnson on behalf of American Family Mutual Insurance CompanyAttorney Katie Berit Johnson added to party American Family Mutual Insurance Company(pty:dft) (Johnson, Katie) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Brenda Frick. American Family Mutual Insurance Company served on 2/20/2019, answer due 3/13/2019. (Singer, Elliot) |
Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER Setting Rule 16(b) Scheduling Conference. The Scheduling Conference is set for 5/16/2019 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom C204 before Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews. The parties shall file their proposed scheduling order, and email a copy in Word format to Crews_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov, on or before 5/9/2019. The Magistrate Judge Consent Form (ECF. #3-1) is due 5/9/2019. SO ORDERED, by Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews on 2/21/2019. Text Only Entry (skclc2, ) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (dbera, ) |
Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews. Text Only Entry (dbera, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against American Family Mutual Insurance Company (Filing fee $ 400,Receipt Number 1082-6536182)Attorney Elliot Asher Singer added to party Brenda Frick(pty:pla), filed by Brenda Frick. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(Singer, Elliot) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Frick v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Brenda Frick | |
Represented By: | Elliot Asher Singer |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: American Family Mutual Insurance Company | |
Represented By: | Katie Berit Johnson |
Represented By: | Debra K. Sutton |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.