Hook et al v. LNV Corporation
| David L. Smith and M. Julia Hook |
| LNV Corporation |
| United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Colorado |
| 1:2019cv01097 |
| April 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Raymond P Moore |
| Bankruptcy Withdrawal |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0157 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER denying #13 "Plaintiffs' Motion to Disqualify United States District Judge Raymond P. Moore; Request to Transfer Motion to the Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Colorado for Hearing and Determination; Request for Stay of Proceedings Pending Resolution of Motion" by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 5/21/19.(dkals, )
|
| Filing 13 MOTION to Disqualify "United States District Judge Raymond P. Moore; Request to Transfer Motion to the Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Colorado for Hearing and Determination; Request for Stay of Proceedings Pending Resolution of Motion" by Plaintiffs M. Julia Hook, David L. Smith. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(cthom, ) |
| Filing 12 RESPONSE TO #10 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Plaintiffs M. Julia Hook, David L. Smith. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(cthom, ) |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re #10 by Defendant LNV CorporationAttorney Julie Andrea Trent added to party LNV Corporation(pty:dft). (Trent, Julie) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE On or before Monday, May 13, 2019, the parties shall SHOW CAUSE why this action should not be dismissed based on (a) improper claim splitting; (b) claim and/or issue preclusion due to the Court's rulings and orders in Hook I; and (c) the same rationale and bases as the numerous orders entered by the Court in Hook I which are directed to the same allegations and claims raised in Hook II. ORDERED by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 4/22/2019. (cthom, )
|
|
Filing 9
Order Granting LNV Corporation's Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond from Adversary No. 18-1250-TBM filed by Clerk pursuant to ecf 7 Minute Order. (cthom, )
|
| Filing 8 Complaint and Jury Demand from Adversary No. 18-1250-TBM filed by Clerk pursuant to ecf 7 Minute Order. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(cthom, ) |
|
Filing 7
MINUTE ORDER: This matter is before the Court upon review of the docket in Adversary Proceeding 18-1250-TBM. Upon such review, the Clerk is directed to request the Clerk of the Bankruptcy Court to transfer copies of the following docket entries filed in the Adversary Proceeding, for filing in this Court: ECF No. 1 and No. 10. SO ORDERED by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 4/16/2019. (Text Only Entry) (rmsec)
|
| Filing 6 Case assigned to Judge Raymond P. Moore. Text Only Entry. (cmadr, ) |
|
Filing 5
MINUTE ORDER by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 8 April 2019. (cmadr, )
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 4 April 2019. (cmadr, )
|
| Filing 3 RESPONSE to Defendants' #2 MOTION to Strike, for Sanctions and for Order to Show Cause by Plaintiff LNV Corporation. (cmadr, ) |
| Filing 2 Defendants' MOTION to Strike, for Sanctions and for Order to Show Cause by Defendants M. Julia Hook, David L. Smith. (cmadr, ) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Enjoin Further Pro Se Pleadings or, in the Alternative, to Withdraw the Reference or Stay Adversary Proceeding by Plaintiff LNV Corporation. (cmadr, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
