Vidmar v. White et al
| Johnn A. Vidmar |
| White, Gentry and Rizo |
| 1:2019cv01468 |
| May 23, 2019 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Lewis T Babcock |
| Gordon P Gallagher |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. not a defendant) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 JUDGMENT by Clerk re: #5 Order of Dismissal on 7/10/2019. (angar, ) |
Filing 5
ORDER of Dismissal. Leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to the filing of a motion seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 7/10/2019. (angar, )
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to Cure Deficiencies. If Plaintiff fails to cure the designated deficiencies within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, the action will be dismissed without further notice. The dismissal shall be without prejudice, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 5/28/2019. (angar, )
|
| Filing 4 Inmate Account Statement by Plaintiff Johnn A. Vidmar. (rroge, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry. (rroge, ) |
| Filing 1 Prisoner COMPLAINT against Gentry, Rizo, White, filed by Johnn A. Vidmar. (Attachments: #1 Inmate Account Balance)(rroge, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
