Adkins v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Charece Adkins |
Dara Khosrowshaihi, Uber Technologies, Inc. and Nikki Krishnamurthy |
1:2019cv02685 |
September 19, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Gordon P Gallagher |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT for Employment Discrimination against Dara Khosrowshaihi, Nikki Krishnamurthy, Uber Technologies, Inc., filed by Charece Adkins.(rvill, ) |
Filing 4 ORDERthat the Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form) (ECF No. #3 ) is GRANTED. That Plaintiff must file, within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, an Amended Employment Discrimination Complaint that complies with this Order. that, if Plaintiff fails to file an Amended Employment Discrimination Complaint that complies with this Order within the time allowed, the action may be dismissed without further notice, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 9/23/2019.(evana, ) |
Filing 3 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs by Plaintiff Charece Adkins. (rsams, ) |
Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry. (rsams, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Dara Khosrowshaihi, Nikki Krishnamurthy, Uber Technologies, Inc., filed by Charece Adkins. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(rsams, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.