Carlson v. Ideal Laundry and Cleaners, Inc.
Christine Carlson |
Ideal Laundry and Cleaners, Inc. |
1:2019cv02870 |
October 8, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Daniel D Domenico |
Scott T Varholak |
Other Labor Litigation |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 Joint MOTION for Protective Order by Defendant Ideal Laundry and Cleaners, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Document)(Thompson, Aaron) |
Filing 13 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of Local Civ. R. 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions, and (5) pursuant to Local Civ. R. 16.6 and at the discretion of the Magistrate Judge, convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. SO ORDERED by Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 11/21/2019. (dddlc3, ) |
Filing 12 CASE REASSIGNED pursuant to #11 Consent/Non-Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. All parties do not consent. This case is randomly reassigned to Judge Daniel D. Domenico. All future pleadings should be designated as 19-cv-02870-DDD. (Text Only Entry) (jgonz, ) |
Filing 11 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Defendant Ideal Laundry and Cleaners, Inc. All parties do not consent.. (Thompson, Aaron) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance of Sam Cannon by Sam C. Cannon on behalf of Christine CarlsonAttorney Sam C. Cannon added to party Christine Carlson(pty:pla) (Cannon, Sam) |
Filing 9 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Thompson, Aaron) |
Filing 8 ANSWER to #2 Complaint by Ideal Laundry and Cleaners, Inc..(Thompson, Aaron) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Gillian Dale on behalf of Ideal Laundry and Cleaners, Inc.Attorney Gillian Dale added to party Ideal Laundry and Cleaners, Inc.(pty:dft) (Dale, Gillian) |
Filing 6 ORDER Setting Scheduling Conference for 12/19/2019 10:00 AM in Courtroom A 402 before Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. Consent Form due by 12/5/2019. Proposed Scheduling Order due 12/12/2019, by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 10/9/2019. (jgonz, ) |
Filing 5 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (cmadr, ) |
Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. Text Only Entry (cmadr, ) |
Filing 3 FIRST AND FINAL NOTICE TO ALL ATTORNEY(S) AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES IN REMOVED, TRANSFERRED, OR OTHER CASES. To receive any further notice in a case removed or transferred to this court, or special matters including discovery disputes, bankruptcy appeals, or withdrawls of reference, Multi-district litigation (MDL), etc., all attorneys and unrepresented parties must enter an appearance under D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(a). An attorney must be an active member of this court's bar and be in good standing in accordance with D.C.COLO.LAttyR 3. A waiver of the fee for bar admission may apply in limited situations. (Text Only Entry) (cmadr, ) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Ideal Laundry and Cleaners, Inc., filed by Christine Carlson.(cmadr, ) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Ideal Laundry and Cleaners, Inc. from Boulder County District Court, Case Number 2019cv30741. (Filing fee $ 400, Receipt Number 1082-6934315), filed by Ideal Laundry and Cleaners, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Summons, #3 Exhibit C - State Dist Court Civil Case Cover Sheet, #4 Exhibit D - Return of Service, #5 Exhibit E - Plaintiff's Territory Sales-Manager Offer Letter, #6 Exhibit F - Delay Prevention Order, #7 Civil Cover Sheet USDC Civil Cover Sheet, #8 Register of Actions (State Dist Ct Docket))(Thompson, Aaron) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Carlson v. Ideal Laundry and Cleaners, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Ideal Laundry and Cleaners, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Aaron John Thompson |
Represented By: | Gillian Dale |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Christine Carlson | |
Represented By: | Sam C. Cannon |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.