Knox v. Bishop-Dalton et al
Plaintiff: Kaylen Knox
Defendant: Monette LLC, Andrea Bishop-Dalton, Leigh Monette and Hale Westfall LLP
Case Number: 1:2019cv02923
Filed: October 15, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Robert E Blackburn
Referring Judge: S Kato Crews
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 4, 2019 Filing 25 ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES: re: #24 Answer to Complaint filed by attorney Dennis Boyd Polk. The document was scanned and not converted directly to portable document format (PDF). DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. Action to take - future documents must be filed pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 5.1(a) and 1.3(f) of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures (Civil cases). (Text Only Entry) (athom, )
December 2, 2019 Filing 24 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, and Jury Demand by Andrea Bishop-Dalton.(Polk, Dennis)
December 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER GRANTING #21 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond. For good cause shown, the Motion is GRANTED. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Hale Westfall, LLP's answer or otherwise responsive pleading is due 12/17/2019. SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews on 12/2/2019. Text Only Entry (skclc2)
December 2, 2019 Filing 22 MEMORANDUM by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 12/2/19 regarding #21 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint, filed by Hale Westfall LLP. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews. Text Only Entry (rebsec)
December 2, 2019 Filing 21 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint, by Defendant Hale Westfall LLP. (Lavin, Andrew)
November 25, 2019 Filing 20 CERTIFICATE of Review Pursuant to Colo.Rev.Stat. 13-20-602 by Plaintiff Kaylen Knox. (Scranton, Keith)
November 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER DENYING AS MOOT #14 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond. After filing the subject motion on 11/11/2019, the Parties filed a #17 Stipulation for Extension of Time to Answer/Respond to Complaint wherein they agreed to the relief requested in the motion. The Stipulation complies with D.C.COLO.LCivR 6.1, making it effective upon filing. Therefore, the #14 Motion for Extension of Time is rendered MOOT. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the #14 Motion is DENIED AS MOOT. Defendant Hale Westfall, LLP's answer or otherwise responsive pleading is due 12/3/2019, pursuant to the #17 Stipulation. SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews on 11/12/2019. Text Only Entry (skclc2)
November 12, 2019 Filing 18 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Andrew Keith Lavin on behalf of Hale Westfall LLPAttorney Andrew Keith Lavin added to party Hale Westfall LLP(pty:dft) (Lavin, Andrew)
November 12, 2019 Filing 17 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Answer or Respond to the Complaint Filed on Behalf of Plaintiff and Defendant Hale Westfall LLP by Defendant Hale Westfall LLP. Hale Westfall LLP answer due 12/3/2019. (Palmeri, John)
November 12, 2019 Filing 16 MEMORANDUM by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 11/12/19 regarding #14 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond filed by Andrea Bishop-Dalton. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews. Text Only Entry (rebsec)
November 11, 2019 Filing 15 ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES: re: #14 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond filed by attorney Dennis Boyd Polk. The document was scanned and not converted directly to portable document format (PDF). DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. Action to take - future documents must be filed pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 5.1(a) and 1.3(f) of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures (Civil cases). (Text Only Entry) (athom, )
November 11, 2019 Filing 14 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond by Defendant Andrea Bishop-Dalton. (Polk, Dennis)
November 8, 2019 Filing 13 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Dennis Boyd Polk on behalf of Andrea Bishop-DaltonAttorney Dennis Boyd Polk added to party Andrea Bishop-Dalton(pty:dft) (Polk, Dennis)
October 25, 2019 Filing 12 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Kaylen Knox. Monette LLC waiver sent on 10/25/2019, answer due 12/24/2019. (Scranton, Keith)
October 25, 2019 Filing 11 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Kaylen Knox. Leigh Monette waiver sent on 10/25/2019, answer due 12/24/2019. (Scranton, Keith)
October 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER Setting Rule 16(b) Scheduling Conference. The Scheduling Conference is set for 1/22/2020 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews. The parties shall file their proposed scheduling order, and email a copy in Word format to Crews_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov, on or before 1/15/2020. The Magistrate Judge Consent Form (ECF. #3-4) is due 1/15/2020. SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews on 10/25/2019. Text Only Entry (skclc2)
October 24, 2019 Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Kaylen Knox. Hale Westfall LLP served on 10/22/2019, answer due 11/12/2019. (Scranton, Keith)
October 24, 2019 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Kaylen Knox. Andrea Bishop-Dalton served on 10/22/2019, answer due 11/12/2019. (Scranton, Keith)
October 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews. IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this matter is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge:(1) To convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b), enter a Scheduling Order that satisfies the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, and enter such orders as appropriate to enforce the Scheduling order and resolve discovery matters; provided, further that the scheduling conference, the Magistrate Judge shall advise the parties of Judge Blackburns practice standards found at www.cod.uscourts.gov.;(2) To hear and finally determine non-dispositive matters that have been referred, subject to the exceptions found in 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A); and(3) To hear and make recommendations on dispositive matters that have been referred as defined in 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A). Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLOLCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the parties by motion, this court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding.By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 10/22/19. Text Only Entry (rebsec)
October 22, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Keith Richard Scranton on behalf of Kaylen KnoxAttorney Keith Richard Scranton added to party Kaylen Knox(pty:pla) (Scranton, Keith)
October 22, 2019 Filing 5 CASE REASSIGNED pursuant to #4 Order of Recusal. This case is randomly reassigned to Judge Robert E. Blackburn. All future pleadings should be designated as 19-cv-02923-REB. (Text Only Entry) (athom, )
October 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER OF RECUSAL. By Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 10/22/2019. (athom, )
October 16, 2019 Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (alave, )
October 15, 2019 Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Daniel D. Domenico and drawn to Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews. Text Only Entry. (alave, )
October 15, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrea Bishop-Dalton, Hale Westfall LLP, Leigh Monette, Monette LLC (Filing fee $ 400,Receipt Number 1082-6945000)Attorney Jeffrey Alan Springer added to party Kaylen Knox(pty:pla), filed by Kaylen Knox. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons)(Springer, Jeffrey)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Knox v. Bishop-Dalton et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Monette LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrea Bishop-Dalton
Represented By: Dennis Boyd Polk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Leigh Monette
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hale Westfall LLP
Represented By: John M. Palmeri
Represented By: Andrew Keith Lavin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kaylen Knox
Represented By: Jeffrey Alan Springer
Represented By: Keith Richard Scranton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?