Brookman v. Dillon Companies, LLC
Plaintiff: Allison Brookman
Defendant: Dillon Companies, LLC and Dillon Companies, LLC doing business as King Soopers Inc.
Case Number: 1:2019cv03292
Filed: November 21, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Daniel D Domenico
Referring Judge: Kristen L Mix
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 2, 2020 Filing 18 KLM Civil Motions Practice Standards, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix. (nmarb, )
January 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER OF REFERENCE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 636(c) Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73, and Civil Local Rule of Practice 72.2, the parties have #16 consented to the disposition of the above action by United States Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix. The above action is REFERRED for final disposition to Judge Mix pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, and Local Civ. R. 72.2. Judge Mix shall conduct any and all further proceedings in this case, including without limitation trial and entry of a final judgment; and the parties and the Clerk of Court are DIRECTED to use the following case number for all future filings in this action: 1:19-cv-03292-KLM, by Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 1/2/2020. (evana, )
January 2, 2020 Filing 16 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Defendant Dillon Companies, LLC All parties consent.. (Randel, Sara)
December 10, 2019 Filing 15 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Joseph Robert Woelkers on behalf of Allison BrookmanAttorney Joseph Robert Woelkers added to party Allison Brookman(pty:pla) (Woelkers, Joseph)
December 4, 2019 Filing 14 ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES: re: #11 Answer to Complaint filed by attorney Sara Naomi Randel. The format for the attorneys signature block is not correct. DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. Action to take - future documents must be filed pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 5.1(a) and 4.3(d) of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures (Civil Cases). (Text Only Entry) (athom, )
November 21, 2019 Filing 13 STATE COURT ORDER GRANTING Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. (alave, )
November 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 11/21/19, Setting Scheduling/Planning Conference. Proposed Scheduling Order due by 2/11/2020. Scheduling/Planning Conference set for 2/18/2020 10:00 AM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1, #2 Attachment 2, #3 Attachment 3) (nmarb, )
November 21, 2019 Filing 11 Defendant's ANSWER to #7 Complaint with Jury Demand by Dillon Companies, LLC.(Randel, Sara)
November 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions, and (5) pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6 and at the discretion of the Magistrate Judge, convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. SO ORDERED by Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 11/21/2019. Text Only Entry (dddlc1, )
November 21, 2019 Filing 9 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (alave, )
November 21, 2019 Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT/RETURN of Service of Civil Summons and Civil Complaint upon Dillon Companies, LLC d/b/a King Soopers on 10/23/2019 (alave, ) (alave, ).
November 21, 2019 Filing 7 COMPLAINT against Dillon Companies, LLC, filed by Allison Brookman.(alave, ) (Main Document 7 replaced on 12/11/2019) (alave, ).
November 21, 2019 Filing 6 Case assigned to Judge Daniel D. Domenico and drawn to Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix. Text Only Entry. (alave, )
November 21, 2019 Filing 5 FIRST AND FINAL NOTICE TO ALL ATTORNEY(S) AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES IN REMOVED, TRANSFERRED, OR OTHER CASES. To receive any further notice in a case removed or transferred to this court, or special matters including discovery disputes, bankruptcy appeals, or withdrawls of reference, Multi-district litigation (MDL), etc., all attorneys and unrepresented parties must enter an appearance under D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(a). An attorney must be an active member of this court's bar and be in good standing in accordance with D.C.COLO.LAttyR 3. A waiver of the fee for bar admission may apply in limited situations. (Text Only Entry) (alave, )
November 21, 2019 Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Randel, Sara)
November 21, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Sara Naomi Randel on behalf of Dillon Companies, LLC, d/b/a King SoopersAttorney Sara Naomi Randel added to party Dillon Companies, LLC, d/b/a King Soopers(pty:dft) (Randel, Sara)
November 21, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Ashley Ricketson Larson on behalf of Dillon Companies, LLC, d/b/a King Soopers (Larson, Ashley)
November 21, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Dillon Companies, LLC, d/b/a King Soopers from Boulder County District Court, Case Number 2019CV30975. (Filing fee $ 400, Receipt Number 1082-7007798), filed by Dillon Companies, LLC, d/b/a King Soopers. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Case Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A to N.Removal, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B to N.Removal, #4 Exhibit Exhibit C to N.Removal, #5 Exhibit Exhibit D to N.Removal, #6 Exhibit Exhibit E to N.Removal, #7 Exhibit Exhibit F to N.Removal, #8 Exhibit Exhibit G to N.Removal, #9 Exhibit Exhibit H to N.Removal, #10 Exhibit Exhibit I to N.Removal)(Larson, Ashley)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brookman v. Dillon Companies, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Allison Brookman
Represented By: Joseph Robert Woelkers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dillon Companies, LLC
Represented By: Ashley Ricketson Larson
Represented By: Sara Naomi Randel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dillon Companies, LLC doing business as King Soopers Inc.
Represented By: Ashley Ricketson Larson
Represented By: Sara Naomi Randel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?