Foote v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Plaintiff: Gary Foote
Defendant: State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Case Number: 1:2020cv02342
Filed: August 6, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Michael E Hegarty
Referring Judge: Raymond P Moore
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 16 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 24 September 2020. The Scheduling Conference currently set on October 1, 2020 is vacated and rescheduled to October 28, 2020, at 1:45 p.m. in Courtroom A-501, on the fifth floor of the Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse located at 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. Proposed Scheduling Order due 10/21/2020. (cmadr, )
September 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 15 Minute ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 21 September 2020. For good cause shown, Defendant's "Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint and Jury Demand" #12 is granted. Defendant shall file an answer or other response to the operative complaint on or before October 14, 2020.(cmadr, )
September 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MINUTE ORDER Due to continued concerns regarding the potential transmission of COVID-19, during the week of September 28, 2020, the Court will permit litigants (counsel and parties) and the public to appear at all scheduled conferences before Magistrate Judge Hegarty either in person or by telephone (unless otherwise ordered). Anyone appearing in person must comply with General Order 2020-14 governing Court Operations During the COVID-19 Pandemic, which may be accessed at www.cod.uscourts.gov. Anyone appearing by telephone shall call the following conference line at the appointed time: Number:888-278-0296 Access code:8212991#. Please remember that, when you call in, you may be entering a proceeding already in progress for a different case; therefore, as you would if you were present in the courtroom, please ensure silence until your case is called. Any questions regarding this procedure may be directed to my chambers at 303-844-4507 or at hegarty_chambers@cod.uscourts.gov. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 09/21/2020. Text Only Entry (mehlc1, )
September 18, 2020 Filing 13 MEMORANDUM regarding #12 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint, filed by State Farm Fire and Casualty Company. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. By Judge Raymond P. Moore on 9/18/2020. (Text Only Entry) (rmsec )
September 18, 2020 Filing 12 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint, by Defendant State Farm Fire and Casualty Company. (Stephenson, Evan)
September 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Minute ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 2 September 2020. For good cause shown, Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answeror Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint #9 is granted. Defendant shall file an answer or other response to the operative pleading on or before September 30, 2020.(cmadr, )
September 2, 2020 Filing 10 MEMORANDUM regarding #9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint, filed by State Farm Fire and Casualty Company. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. By Judge Raymond P. Moore on 9/2/2020. (Text Only Entry) (rmsec )
September 2, 2020 Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint, by Defendant State Farm Fire and Casualty Company. (Stephenson, Evan)
August 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 10 August 2020. This Court will hold the Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) Scheduling Conference on October 1, 2020, at 10:15 a.m. in Courtroom A-501, on the fifth floor of the Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse located at 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. Proposed Scheduling Order due 9/25/2020. (cmadr, )
August 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER: With the assignment of this matter, the parties are advised that throughout this case they are expected to be familiar and comply with not only the Local Rules of this District, but also Judge Raymond P. Moore's Civil Practice Standards, which may be found at: http://www.cod.uscourts.gov/JudicialOfficers/ActiveArticleIIIJudges/HonRaymondPMoore.aspx. SO ORDERED by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 8/10/2020. (Text Only Entry) (rmsec )
August 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct a pretrial conference and enter a pretrial order, and (5) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions. Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the parties by motion, this court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. Entered by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 8/10/2020. (Text Only Entry) (rmsec )
August 10, 2020 Filing 5 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (rvill, )
August 7, 2020 Filing 4 SUMMONS REQUEST as to State Farm Fire and Casualty Company by Plaintiff Gary Foote. (Peirce, Christopher)
August 6, 2020 Filing 3 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). NO SUMMONS ISSUED. (jtorr, )
August 6, 2020 Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Raymond P. Moore and drawn to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Text Only Entry. (jtorr, )
August 6, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (Filing fee $ 400,Receipt Number 1082-7424587)Attorney Christopher Patrick Peirce added to party Gary Foote(pty:clm), filed by Gary Foote. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Peirce, Christopher)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Foote v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gary Foote
Represented By: Christopher Patrick Peirce
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Represented By: Evan Bennett Stephenson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?