Quintana v. Briggs et al
Plaintiff: Ambrose Quintana
Defendant: J. Briggs and Steve Reams
Case Number: 1:2020cv02784
Filed: September 14, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Lewis T Babcock
Referring Judge: Gordon P Gallagher
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 26, 2020 Filing 9 RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. This Magistrate Judge respectfully RECOMMENDS that the Prisoner Complaint (ECF No. #1 ) and this action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for Plaintiffs failure to comply with Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. By Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on October 26, 2020. (rvill, )
October 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER OF REFERENCE TO UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE This action is under review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, and D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.1, United States Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher is designated to conduct proceedings in this civil action, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 10/23/2020. (evana, )
October 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER. Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1, the Clerk of Court is directed to assign this matter to Senior Judge Lewis T. Babcock. The undersigned will remain as the assigned magistrate judge. By Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on October 22, 2020. (rvill, )
September 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER Directing Plaintiff to File Amended Prisoner Complaint. If Plaintiff fails to file an Amended Prisoner Complaint that complies with this Order within the time allowed, the action will be dismissed without further notice. By Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on September 15, 2020. (Forms mailed as Ordered) (rvill, )
September 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER Granting #2 Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 20 U.S.C. 1915. By Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on September 15, 2020. (rvill, )
September 14, 2020 Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Pro Bono Counsel by Plaintiff Ambrose Quintana. (trvo, )
September 14, 2020 Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry. (trvo, )
September 14, 2020 Filing 2 Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. by Plaintiff Ambrose Quintana. (trvo, )
September 14, 2020 Filing 1 Prisoner COMPLAINT against J. Briggs, Steve Reams, filed by Ambrose Quintana. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (trvo, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Quintana v. Briggs et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ambrose Quintana
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J. Briggs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Steve Reams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?