Katt v. SOBO 54 Investments I, LLC
| David Katt |
| SOBO 54 Investments I, LLC |
| 1:2020cv02934 |
| September 29, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Lewis T Babcock |
| Michael E Hegarty |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12181 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 12 November 2020. Before the Court is Plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) #8 . The case was dismissed with prejudice as of the entry of the Notice. No order of dismissal is necessary. The Clerk of Court shall close this case. In light of the foregoing, the Scheduling Conference currently set for November 30, 2020 is vacated. (cmadr, )
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal of Case with Prejudice by Plaintiff David Katt (Marcus, Ari) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by David Katt. SOBO 54 Investments I, LLC served on 10/18/2020, answer due 11/9/2020. (Marcus, Ari) |
|
Filing 6
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 30 September 2020. The parties shall complete and file the Magistrate Judge Consent Form (ECF 3-1) on or before November 10, 2020. It is further ORDERED that the Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) Scheduling Conference shall be held on November 30, 2020, at 11:15 a.m. in Courtroom A-501, on the fifth floor of the Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse located at 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. Consent Form due by 11/10/2020. Proposed Scheduling Order due 11/23/2020. (cmadr, )
|
| Filing 5 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (angar, ) |
| Filing 4 MEMORANDUM RETURNING CASE, by Senior Judge Lewis T. Babcock. This case is randomly returned to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty for all further proceedings. All future pleadings should be designated as 20-cv-2934-MEH (angar, ) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (cpomm, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Lewis T. Babcock and drawn to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. Text Only Entry (cpomm, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against SOBO 54 INVESTMENTS I, LLC (Filing fee $ 400,Receipt Number 1082-7511162)Attorney Ari Hillel Marcus added to party DAVID KATT(pty:pla), filed by DAVID KATT. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Marcus, Ari) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Katt v. SOBO 54 Investments I, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: David Katt | |
| Represented By: | Ari Hillel Marcus |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: SOBO 54 Investments I, LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
