Stingley v. True
| Richard Stingley |
| B. True |
| 1:2021cv02141 |
| August 6, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Gordon P Gallagher |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number cox100607 (sphil, ) |
| Filing 11 Acknowledgment Letter of Service on behalf of the United States Attorneys office for the District of Colorado on 9/28/2021. (sphil, ) |
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of Service by Clerk of Court re: #4 Amended Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #9 Order to File Preliminary Response for Service of Process (Attachments: #1 USPS Certified Mail Receipt) (sphil, ) |
Filing 9
ORDER to File Preliminary Response. Within twenty-one (21) days from the date of this Order Respondent shall file a Preliminary Response that complies with this Order, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 9/24/2021. (sphil, )
|
| Filing 8 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number cox100378 (sphil, ) |
|
Filing 7
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 9/9/2021, re: #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Pay the Filing Fee is GRANTED. Pursuant to the Courts Order Directing Applicant to Cure Deficiencies (ECF No. 3), Applicant must either submit a 28 U.S.C. 1915 Motion and Affidavit on the court-approved form or pay the $5.00 filing fee within thirty (30) days from the date of this Minute Order. (sphil, )
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Time Extension by Petitioner Richard Stingley. (agarc, ) |
| Filing 5 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: #1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus, 2 Case Assigned to Judge Addressed to Richard Stingley. (sphil, ) |
| Filing 4 AMENDED APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus 2241, filed by Richard Stingley.(sphil, ) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER DIRECTING APPLICANT TO CURE DEFICIENCIES within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. Any papers that Applicant files in response to this Order must include the civil action number on this Order. That the Clerk of the Court send to Applicant (1) the Court-approved Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241; (2) Prisoners Motion and an Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 in a Habeas Corpus Action; and (3) any application instructions, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 8/10/2021. (mailed as ordered) (evana, )
|
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry. (jsalz, ) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 USC 2241, filed by Richard Stingley. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jsalz, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Stingley v. True | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Richard Stingley | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: B. True | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
