Energy Environmental Corporation v. City and County of Denver
Plaintiff: Energy Environmental Corporation
Defendant: City and County of Denver, Acting By and Through Its Board Of Water Commissioners a/k/a/ Denver Water, City and County of Denver, The and Denver Water
Case Number: 1:2021cv02235
Filed: August 17, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: S Kato Crews
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 15, 2021 Filing 14 Partial MOTION to Dismiss with Prejudice Plaintiff's First, Second, and Third Claims for Relief by Defendant City and County of Denver, The. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Nitta, Chad)
September 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER granting #12 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond. Given its unopposed nature, the Court finds good cause to GRANT the Motion. Accordingly, Defendant has up to and including 10-15-2021 to answer or otherwise respond. SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews on 9-21-2021. Text Only Entry (skclc2).
September 20, 2021 Filing 12 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint,, by Plaintiff Energy Environmental Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Cha, Paul)
September 14, 2021 Filing 11 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Paul Sung Cha on behalf of Energy Environmental CorporationAttorney Paul Sung Cha added to party Energy Environmental Corporation(pty:pla) (Cha, Paul)
September 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Setting Telephonic Rule 16(b) Scheduling Conference. The Telephonic Scheduling Conference is set for 12-8-2021 at 10:00 am in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews. The parties shall file their proposed scheduling order, and email a copy in Word format to Crews_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov, 7 days before the Scheduling Conference (12-2-2021).The Magistrate Judge Consent Form [#6-1] is due 12-2-2021. Dial in information for the Scheduling Conference is as follows:CONFERENCE CALL LINE: (888) 251-2909ACCESS CODE: 5662814# SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews on 9-10-2021. Text Only Entry (skclc2).
September 9, 2021 Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Energy Environmental Corporation. City and County of Denver, The served on 9/1/2021, answer due 9/22/2021. (Blakely, Todd)
September 3, 2021 Filing 8 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (agarc, )
August 26, 2021 Filing 7 SUMMONS REQUEST as to The City and County of Denver, Acting By and Through Its Board of Water Commissioners aka Denver Water by Plaintiff Energy Environmental Corporation. (Blakely, Todd)
August 17, 2021 Filing 6 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (jsalz, )
August 17, 2021 Filing 5 Report re Patent/Trademark: Report on the filing of an action emailed (NEF) to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (jsalz, )
August 17, 2021 Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews. Text Only Entry (jsalz, )
August 17, 2021 Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Blakely, Todd)
August 17, 2021 Filing 2 SUMMONS REQUEST as to Defendant City and County of Denver re #1 Complaint,, by Plaintiff Energy Environmental Corporation. (Blakely, Todd)
August 17, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against City and County of Denver, Acting By and Through Its Board Of Water Commissioners a/k/a/ Denver Water (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number ACODC-8026806)Attorney Todd P. Blakely added to party Energy Environmental Corporation(pty:pla), filed by Energy Environmental Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, part 1, #6 Exhibit 5, part 2, #7 Exhibit 6, #8 Exhibit 7, #9 Exhibit 8, #10 Exhibit 9, #11 Exhibit 10, #12 Exhibit 11, #13 Exhibit 12, #14 Exhibit 13, #15 Civil Cover Sheet)(Blakely, Todd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Energy Environmental Corporation v. City and County of Denver
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Energy Environmental Corporation
Represented By: Todd P. Blakely
Represented By: Paul Sung Cha
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City and County of Denver, Acting By and Through Its Board Of Water Commissioners a/k/a/ Denver Water
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City and County of Denver, The
Represented By: Chad Takashi Nitta
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Denver Water
Represented By: Chad Takashi Nitta
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?