Ratcliff v. Arapahoe County Sheriff Department et al
Michael Ratcliff |
Arapahoe County Sheriff Department, El Paso County Sheriff's Department, Colorado Springs Police Department and Well Path |
1:2021cv03462 |
December 27, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Lewis T Babcock |
Gordon P Gallagher |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 JUDGMENT by Clerk re: #4 Order of Dismissal on 2/2/2022. (angar, ) |
Filing 4 ORDER of Dismissal. Leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied without prejudice to the filing of a motion seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 2/2/2022. (angar, ) |
Filing 3 ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO CURE DEFICIENCIES within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. Any papers that Plaintiff files in response to this order must include the civil action number on this order, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 12/29/2021. (evana, ) |
Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher Text Only Entry. (jcharl, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Violation of Civil Rights against Arapahoe County Sheriff Department, Colorado Springs Police Department, El Paso County Sheriff's Department, Well Path, filed by Michael Ratcliff. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jcharl, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.