Shaker v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
Plaintiff: Mahmoud Omar Shaker
Defendant: United Parcel Service, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2022cv01534
Filed: June 20, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 451 Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 20, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND against United Parcel Service, Inc. (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number ACODC-8514067)Attorney Daphne Shih Gebauer added to party Mahmoud Omar Shaker(pty:pla), filed by Mahmoud Omar Shaker. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Gebauer, Daphne)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shaker v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mahmoud Omar Shaker
Represented By: Daphne Shih Gebauer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United Parcel Service, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?