Hardy v. Ring et al
| Ralph Hardy |
| Megan Ring, Brian Mason and Richard Reigenborn |
| 1:2022cv01666 |
| July 5, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Gordon P Gallagher |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. not a defendant) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
MINUTE ORDER. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint Adding Defendant Adams County' (ECF No. #16 ) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Motion to Take Judicial Notice and to Compel Access to Legal Material (ECF No. #9 ), in which Plaintiff asks the Court to order Adams County Sheriff Richard Reigenborn "to provide him with the same legal equipment and access as is provided to State Prisoners in the Colorado Department of Corrections," is DENIED. Plaintiff's Motion to Take Judicial Notice (ECF No. #10 ) is DENIED because Plaintiff does not identify any judicially noticeable facts pertinent to his own claims in this action, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 9/2/2022.(angar, )
|
| Filing 16 MOTION for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint adding Defendant Adams County, by Plaintiff Ralph Hardy. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Document)(angar, ) |
|
Filing 15
MINUTE ORDER. Plaintiff's "Motion for Preliminary Injunction" (ECF No. #3 ), "Motion to Certify Action a Class Action" (ECF No. #4 ), and "Motion to Appoint Counsel for Class Action Certification" (ECF No. #8 ) are DENIED, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 8/26/2022.(angar, )
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER Granting #2 Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 8/25/2022. copy sent to the Adams County Detention Facility(angar, )
|
| Filing 13 LETTERS from Non-parties Derrick James Sanders and Jonathan Garcia at Adams County Detention Facility. (agarc, ) |
| Filing 12 LETTERS from Non-parties Andre James Lemasters and Matthew Rocha at Adams County Detention Facility. (agarc, ) |
| Filing 11 LETTER from Non-party Zakaryah Endicott at Adams County Detention Facility. (agarc, ) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to take Judicial Notice, by Plaintiff Ralph Hardy. (angar, ) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Take Judicial Notice and to Compel Access to Legal Material by Plaintiff Ralph Hardy. (sapod, ) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Appoint Counsel for Class Action Certification by Plaintiff Ralph Hardy. (sapod, ) |
| Filing 7 AMENDED PRISONER COMPLAINT against Brian Mason, Richard Reigenborn, Megan Ring, filed by Ralph Hardy.(sapod, ) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO CURE DEFICIENCY. If Plaintiff fails to cure the designated deficiency within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, the action will be dismissed without further notice. The dismissal shall be without prejudice. By Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 07/06/2022. (athom, )
|
| Filing 5 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry (norlin, ) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Certify Action a Class Action by Plaintiff Ralph Hardy. (norlin, ) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Plaintiff Ralph Hardy. (norlin, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER'S Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. by Plaintiff Ralph Hardy. (norlin, ) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL ACTION and JURY DEMAND against Brian Mason, Richard Reigenborn, Megan Ring, filed by Ralph Hardy. (Attachments: #1 Attachments, #2 Envelope)(norlin, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
