Barrack v. United States Department of Justice
| Thomas J. Barrack, Jr. |
| United States Department of Justice |
| 1:2022cv01800 |
| July 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Raymond P Moore |
| Freedom of Information Act of 1974 |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
RESPONSE to #14 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Plaintiff Thomas J. Barrack, Jr. (Dunn, Jason)
|
|
Filing 15
REPLY to Response to #2 Emergency MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Expedited Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by Plaintiff Thomas J. Barrack, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3)(Dunn, Jason)
|
|
Filing 14
MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint by Defendant United States Department of Justice. (Andrapalliyal, Vinita)
|
|
Filing 13
BRIEF in Opposition to #2 Emergency MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Expedited Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by Defendant United States Department of Justice. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Kevin G. Tiernan, #2 Exhibit Exhibits)(Andrapalliyal, Vinita)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #11 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. SO ORDERED by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 8/12/2022. (Text Only Entry)(rmsec )
|
|
Filing 11
Unopposed MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages by Defendant United States Department of Justice. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Andrapalliyal, Vinita)
|
|
Filing 10
COURTROOM MINUTES for proceedings held before Judge Raymond P. Moore: Status Conference held on 8/5/2022. #2 Expedited Motion for Preliminary Injunction is denied as to having the Preliminary Injunction heard on an expedited basis; however, the preliminary injunction motion remains pending. Court Reporter: Tammy Hoffschildt. (cpear)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting Unopposed Motion of Thomas Barrack, Jr. Requesting Status Conference Be Held via Teleconference #8 . The Status Conference set for 8/5/2022 at 1:00 PM will be held telephonically. The parties are directed to contact the Court's Courtroom Deputy via email (Cathy_Pearson@cod.uscourts.gov) on or before 4:30 PM on Wednesday, August 3, 2022, for instructions to appear telephonically. SO ORDERED by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 8/1/2022. (Text Only Entry)(rmsec )
|
|
Filing 8
Unopposed MOTION for Order to Hold August 5, 2022 Status Conference Telephonically by Plaintiff Thomas J. Barrack, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Dunn, Jason)
|
|
Filing 7
MINUTE ORDER: Status Conference set for 8/5/2022 at 01:00 PM in Courtroom A 601 before Judge Raymond P. Moore on the sixth floor of the Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse located at 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. SO ORDERED by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 7/27/2022. (Text Only Entry) (rmsec )
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Vinita Andrapalliyal on behalf of United States Department of JusticeAttorney Vinita Andrapalliyal added to party United States Department of Justice(pty:dft) (Andrapalliyal, Vinita)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Joseph C. Haupt on behalf of Thomas J. Barrack, JrAttorney Joseph C. Haupt added to party Thomas J. Barrack, Jr(pty:pla) (Haupt, Joseph)
|
|
Filing 4
SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (norlin, )
|
|
Filing 3
Case assigned to Judge Raymond P. Moore and drawn to Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix. Text Only Entry (norlin, )
|
|
Filing 2
Emergency MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Expedited Motion for Preliminary Injunction by Plaintiff Thomas J Barrack. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1- FOIA Request, #2 Exhibit 2- Request NSD, #3 Exhibit 3- Update, #4 Exhibit 4- Request for follow-up, #5 Exhibit 5- Letter 6-6-22, #6 Exhibit 6- Email re Appeal, #7 Exhibit 7- Email re NSD FOIA, #8 Exhibit 8- Letter 7-8-22, #9 Exhibit 9- Letter 7-14-22, #10 Exhibit 10- Letter 7-14-22)(Dunn, Jason)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT for Expedited Declaratory and Injunctive Relief Under the Freedom of Information Act against United States Department of Justice (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number ACODC-8565214)Attorney Jason R. Dunn added to party Thomas J Barrack(pty:pla), filed by Thomas J Barrack. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1- FOIA Request, #2 Exhibit 2- DOJ Response, #3 Exhibit 3- Response, #4 Exhibit 4- Email, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Summons To the Dept. of Justice, #7 Summons To the US Attorney, #8 Summons To the Attorney General)(Dunn, Jason)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Barrack v. United States Department of Justice | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Thomas J. Barrack, Jr. | |
| Represented By: | Jason R. Dunn |
| Represented By: | Joseph C. Haupt |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States Department of Justice | |
| Represented By: | Vinita Andrapalliyal |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
