Prestwick Licensing LLC v. Keysight Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff: Prestwick Licensing LLC
Defendant: Keysight Technologies, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2022cv01867
Filed: July 28, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Maritza Dominguez Braswell
Referring Judge: Nina Y Wang
2 Judge: Nina Y Wang
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 AMENDED ORDER SETTING INITIAL CASE DEADLINES. Proposed Scheduling Order due 10/31/2022. By Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell on 9/8/2022. (evaug )
September 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MINUTE ORDER granting #10 Agreed Motion to Extend Time to Respond to the Complaint and Submit a Proposed Scheduling Order. Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to the #1 Complaint, on or before October 17, 2022. The initial case deadlines are VACATED and will be reset by separate order. By Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell on 09/08/22. Text Only Entry(mdblc2)
September 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MEMORANDUM regarding #10 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #8 Order, #1 Complaint, (Agreed) filed by Prestwick Licensing LLC. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell. By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 09/08/2022. Text Only Entry (nywlc2, )
September 8, 2022 Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #8 Order, #1 Complaint, (Agreed) by Plaintiff Prestwick Licensing LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Bennett, David)
August 17, 2022 Filing 9 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Answer or Respond to the Complaint by Defendant Keysight Technologies, Inc.. Keysight Technologies, Inc. answer due 9/16/2022. (Bennett, David)
August 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER SETTING INITIAL CASE DEADLINES. Proposed Scheduling Order due on or before 10/3/2022. So ORDERED by Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell on 8/1/2022. (evaug)
July 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER REFERRING CASE: This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell for non-dispositive matters. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, and (4) conduct a pretrial conference and enter a pretrial order. Court-sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the Magistrate Judge or on the request of the parties by motion, this court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. Counsel for the Parties and all counsel who may later enter an appearance shall review and familiarize themselves with the undersigned's Practice Standards, as well as the Practice Standards of the assigned Magistrate Judge. By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 07/29/2022. Text Only Entry (nywlc2, )
July 28, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE Report of the Filing or Determination of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark by Plaintiff Prestwick Licensing LLC (Bennett, David)
July 28, 2022 Filing 5 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (norlin, )
July 28, 2022 Filing 4 Case assigned to District Judge Nina Y Wang and drawn to Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell. Text Only Entry (norlin, )
July 28, 2022 Filing 3 Administrative Notice: Notice to filer of non-compliance with Patent, Trademark, or Copyright Action case opening procedures. It is the responsibility of the attorney or pro se party commencing the action to follow Local Rule D.C.COLO.LCivR 3.1. Please file a properly completed Report form, which can be found on the courts website. (Text Only Entry) (norlin, )
July 28, 2022 Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Bennett, David)
July 28, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against Keysight Technologies, Inc. (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number ACODC-8576003)Attorney David R. Bennett added to party Prestwick Licensing LLC(pty:pla), filed by Prestwick Licensing LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - U.S. Patent No. 7,668,301, #2 Exhibit B - U.S. Patent No. 9,179,339, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons)(Bennett, David)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Prestwick Licensing LLC v. Keysight Technologies, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Prestwick Licensing LLC
Represented By: David R. Bennett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Keysight Technologies, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?