California Innovations Inc. v. Ice Rover, Inc.
Plaintiff: California Innovations Inc.
Defendant: Ice Rover, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2022cv01986
Filed: August 9, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Raymond P Moore
Referring Judge: N Reid Neureiter
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 0101 (35:101 Patent Infringement)
Jury Demanded By: Both
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 28, 2022 Filing 17 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Sawtelle, James)
September 28, 2022 Filing 16 Ice Rover, Inc.'s ANSWER to #1 Complaint, , COUNTERCLAIM against California Innovations Inc. by Ice Rover, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3)(Sawtelle, James)
September 23, 2022 Filing 15 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by James Gordon Sawtelle on behalf of Ice Rover, Inc.Attorney James Gordon Sawtelle added to party Ice Rover, Inc.(pty:dft) (Sawtelle, James)
September 13, 2022 Filing 14 NOTICE of Change of Address/Contact Information by Lee F. Johnston (Johnston, Lee)
August 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 Minute ORDER by Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter on 30 August 2022. Finding good cause, it is hereby ORDERED that the Stipulated to Extend the Time for Defendant to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint for Declaratory Judgment of Patent Non-Infringement (Dkt. #11 ) is GRANTED. Defendant shall answer or otherwiserespond to the Complaint on or before September 28, 2022. PLEASE READ ATTACHED MINUTE ORDER. (cmadr, )
August 30, 2022 Filing 12 MEMORANDUM regarding #11 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint, filed by California Innovations Inc. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter. By Judge Raymond P. Moore on 8/30/2022. (Text Only Entry) (rmsec )
August 29, 2022 Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint, by Plaintiff California Innovations Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only) Granting Stipulated Motion to Extend Time for Defendant to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint)(Johnston, Lee)
August 11, 2022 Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by California Innovations Inc.. Ice Rover, Inc. served on 8/10/2022, answer due 8/31/2022. (Johnston, Lee)
August 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING/PLANNING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter on 10 August 2022. Proposed Scheduling Order due 10/19/2022. Scheduling Conference set for 10/26/2022 10:00 AM in Courtroom C203 before Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter. The Scheduling Conference will be conducted via telephone. The parties are directed to call the conference line as a participant at (888) 398-2342, Access Code 5755390# at the scheduled time. (cmadr, )
August 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER: With the assignment of this matter, the parties are advised that throughout this case they are expected to be familiar and comply with not only the Local Rules of this District, but also Judge Raymond P. Moore's Civil Practice Standards, which may be found at: http://www.cod.uscourts.gov/JudicialOfficers/ActiveArticleIIIJudges/HonRaymondPMoore.aspx. SO ORDERED by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 8/9/2022. (Text Only Entry) (rmsec )
August 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct a pretrial conference and enter a pretrial order, and (5) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions. Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the parties by motion, this court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. By Judge Raymond P. Moore on 8/9/2022. (Text Only Entry) (rmsec )
August 9, 2022 Filing 6 Report re Patent/Trademark: Report on the filing of an action emailed (NEF) to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (norlin, )
August 9, 2022 Filing 5 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (norlin, )
August 9, 2022 Filing 4 Case assigned to Judge Raymond P. Moore and drawn to Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter. Text Only Entry (norlin, )
August 9, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE - Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark by Plaintiff California Innovations Inc. (Johnston, Lee)
August 9, 2022 Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Johnston, Lee)
August 9, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ice Rover, Inc. (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number ACODC-8596686)Attorney Lee F. Johnston added to party California Innovations Inc.(pty:pla), filed by California Innovations Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Civil Cover Sheet, #8 Summons)(Johnston, Lee)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: California Innovations Inc. v. Ice Rover, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: California Innovations Inc.
Represented By: Lee F. Johnston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ice Rover, Inc.
Represented By: James Gordon Sawtelle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?