Buckmelter v. Credit Control, LLC
| Eve Buckmelter |
| Credit Control, LLC |
| 1:2022cv02041 |
| August 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Robert E Blackburn |
| Gordon P Gallagher |
| N Reid Neureiter |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER: Scheduling Conference which had been set for 11/21/2022 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom C203 before Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter is HEREBY VACATED. Scheduling Conference re-set for 11/9/2022 11:00 AM in Room 323 (Grand Junction) before Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Proposed Scheduling Order due 11/2/2022. The Scheduling Conference will be conducted via telephone. The parties are directed to call the conference line as a participant at (888) 363-4749, Access Code 3136546# at the scheduled time. By Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on September 21, 2022. Text Only Entry (gpgsec, )
|
| Filing 8 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent Credit Control Holdings, Inc. for Credit Control, LLC. (Martin, Eugene) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, Attorney Eugene Xerxes Martin, IV added to party Credit Control, LLC(pty:dft) by Credit Control, LLC.(Martin, Eugene) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER: This matter has its factual nexus in Mesa County. According to the Court's Revised Jury Plan for Random Jury Selection, this case is therefore properly designated for Jury Division 3. Because the jury will be drawn from that Division, it is appropriate that the case be managed, for pretrial purposes, by Magistrate Judge Gallagher in Grand Junction. Accordingly, pursuant to D.C. Colo. L. Civ. R. 40.1(a), and as approved by the Chief Judge of the Court, the undersigned directs that the Clerk of the Court reassign this action to Magistrate Judge Gallagher as the referral judge. All further pleadings in this case shall reflect the case number of 22-cv-02041-REB-GPG. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 9/9/2022. Text Only Entry (rebsec)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING/PLANNING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter on 12 August 2022. Proposed Scheduling Order due 11/14/2022. Scheduling Conference set for 11/21/2022 02:00 PM in Courtroom C203 before Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter. The Scheduling Conference will be conducted via telephone. The parties are directed to call the conference line as a participant at (888) 398-2342, Access Code 5755390# at the scheduled time. (cmadr, )
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter. IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a)and (b), this matter is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge:(1) To convene a scheduling conference under FED. R. CIV. P. 16(b), enter a SchedulingOrder that satisfies the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, and enter such orders asappropriate to enforce the Scheduling order and resolve discovery matters; provided, furtherthat the scheduling conference, the Magistrate Judge shall advise the parties of JudgeBlackburns practice standards found at www.cod.uscourts.gov.;(2) To hear and finally determine non-dispositive matters that have been referred,subject to the exceptions found in 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A); and(3) To hear and make recommendations on dispositive matters that have been referredas defined in 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A).Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLOLCivR 16.6. Onthe recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the partiesby motion, this court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, asettlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 8/11/2022. Text Only Entry (rebsec)
|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (norlin, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Robert E. Blackburn and drawn to Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter. Text Only Entry (norlin, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Eve Buckmelter against Credit Control, LLC (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number ACODC-8601734)Attorney Yaakov Saks added to party Eve Buckmelter(pty:pla), filed by Eve Buckmelter. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Collection Letter, #2 Exhibit Bank Records, #3 Exhibit Confirmation of Payment, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Summons)(Saks, Yaakov) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Buckmelter v. Credit Control, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Eve Buckmelter | |
| Represented By: | Yaakov Saks |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Credit Control, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Eugene Xerxes Martin, IV |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
