Ashton-Cirillo v. Twitter, Inc.
| Sarah Ashton-Cirillo |
| Twitter, Inc. |
| 1:2022cv02692 |
| October 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Robert E Blackburn |
| S Kato Crews |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (jcharl, ) |
| Filing 7 PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT against Twitter, Inc., filed by Sarah Ashton-Cirillo.(jcharl, ) |
| Filing 6 FIRST AND FINAL NOTICE TO ALL ATTORNEY(S) AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES IN REMOVED, TRANSFERRED, OR OTHER CASES. To receive any further notice in a case removed or transferred to this court, or special matters including discovery disputes, bankruptcy appeals, or withdrawals of reference, Multi-district litigation (MDL), etc., all attorneys and unrepresented parties must enter an appearance under D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(a). An attorney must be an active member of this court's bar and be in good standing in accordance with D.C.COLO.LAttyR 3. A waiver of the fee for bar admission may apply in limited situations. (Text Only Entry) (jcharl, ) |
| Filing 5 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews. Text Only Entry. (jcharl, ) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Emily Jane Barnet on behalf of Twitter, Inc.Attorney Emily Jane Barnet added to party Twitter, Inc.(pty:dft) (Barnet, Emily) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Ari Holtzblatt on behalf of Twitter, Inc.Attorney Ari Holtzblatt added to party Twitter, Inc.(pty:dft) (Holtzblatt, Ari) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent No Corporate Parent for Twitter, Inc.. (Martin, Shelby) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Twitter, Inc. from District Court, City and County of Denver, Co., Case Number 2022CV31861. (Filing fee $ 402, Receipt Number ACODC-8716862), filed by Twitter, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Restated Certificate of Incorporation, #2 Exhibit A - State Court Docket, #3 Exhibit B - State Court Complaint, #4 Exhibit C - State Court Process Documents, #5 Exhibit D - State Court Order to Show Cause, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(Martin, Shelby) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ashton-Cirillo v. Twitter, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sarah Ashton-Cirillo | |
| Represented By: | Ian Trevor Hicks |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Twitter, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Ari Holtzblatt |
| Represented By: | Emily Jane Barnet |
| Represented By: | Shelby Lynne Martin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
