S.B. v. Garland et al
S.B. |
A.G. (U.S.) Merrick Garland, Secretary, US DHS Alejandro Mayorkas, Acting Director Tae D. JOHNSON, Exec.Assoc.Director Corey PRICE, Director Christopher L. JONES, GEO Group Inc.,, Warden Warden, Aurora Detention Center, EOIR, Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Tae D. Johnson, Corey A. Price, Christopher L. Jones, Warden and Executive Office of Immigration Review |
1:2022cv03113 |
December 1, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Michael E Hegarty |
Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Minute ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 6 December 2022. It remains Petitioner's responsibility to comply with the requirements for providing all Respondents with notice of his 2241 Application as the law requires. In addition, Petitioner shall forward a copy of this Minute Order to Respondents along with his 2241 Application. The Clerk of Court shall mail a copy of this Minute Order to the local office of the U.S. Attorney's Office at:United States Attorney's Office for the District of Colorado Suite 1600 1801 California St. Denver, CO 80202. The parties shall complete and file the Magistrate Judge Consent Form (ECF #5 ) on or before December 30, 2022.A copy of the consent form is attached to this Minute Order. (cmadr, ) |
Filing 6 Administrative Notice: Per 7 D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.2 a Motion for Leave to Restrict must be filed along with the document(s) the attorney or pro se party wishes the court to restrict. (Text Only Entry) (norlin, ) |
Filing 5 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. No Summons Issued. (norlin, ) |
Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Text Only Entry (norlin, ) |
Filing 3 ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES: Metin Serbest. Attorney or pro se has used an incorrect signature format in violation of D.C.COLO.LCivR 5.1(a) and 4.3(a) of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures (Civil cases). DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. In the future, the filer must affix an electronic s/signature and s/followed by a typed, not an inked, signature to all future documents. Signature block must also include full address and contact information.(Text Only Entry) (norlin, ) |
Filing 2 RESTRICTED DOCUMENT - Level 1: by Respondents EOIR, GEO Group Inc.,, Merrick Garland, Tae D. JOHNSON, Christopher L. JONES, Alejandro Mayorkas, Corey PRICE, Warden, Aurora Detention Center.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit Attachment to Habeas Corpus Petition (File Under Restriction 2 of 7), #2 Exhibit Exhibit Attachment to Habeas Corpus Petition (File Under Restriction 3 of 7), #3 Exhibit Exhibit Attachment to Habeas Corpus Petition (File Under Restriction 4 of 7), #4 Exhibit Exhibit Attachment to Habeas Corpus Petition (File Under Restriction 5 of 7), #5 Exhibit Exhibit Attachment to Habeas Corpus Petition (File Under Restriction 6 of 7), #6 Exhibit Exhibit Attachment to Habeas Corpus Petition (File Under Restriction 7 of 7))(Serbest, Metin) |
Filing 1 Emergency APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2241 (Filing fee $ 5, Receipt Number ACODC-8806487)Attorney Metin Serbest added to party S.B.(pty:pet), filed by S.B.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit List in Support of Petition, #2 Motion for Restricted Filing / Filing Under Seal)(Serbest, Metin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.