Palantir Technologies Inc.

Palantir Technologies Inc.

Case Number:	1:2022mc00062
Filed:	June 30, 2022
Court:	US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office:	Denver Office
Nature of Suit:	Other

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 30, 2022	Filing 24 ORDER ON APPLICATION FOR ORDER TO OBTAIN DISCOVERY PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1782(Dkt. # 1 ) by Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter on 30 June 2022. Palantir's request under 28 U.S.C. § 1782 to obtain a deposition of Mr. Abramowitz and su bpoena documents from his American counsel is improper because it seeks attorney-client privileged information and attorney work product. Mr. Abramowitz's the attorney-client privilege has not been waived with respect to this information. I have also reviewed in camera the disputed documents anddo not find any basis to find that the crime-fraud exception to the attorney-client privilege would apply. Because the application seeks attorney-client privileged information as to which no exception applies, granting the application would violate 28 U.S.C. § 1782 and constitute an undue burden under the discretionary factors listed by the Supreme Court. Therefore, Petitioner Palantirs application is DENIED.(cmadr, )

Date Filed

Document Text

June 30, 2022

Filing 24 ORDER ON APPLICATION FOR ORDER TO OBTAIN DISCOVERY PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1782(Dkt. # 1 ) by Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter on 30 June 2022. Palantir's request under 28 U.S.C. § 1782 to obtain a deposition of Mr. Abramowitz and su bpoena documents from his American counsel is improper because it seeks attorney-client privileged information and attorney work product. Mr. Abramowitz's the attorney-client privilege has not been waived with respect to this information. I have also reviewed in camera the disputed documents anddo not find any basis to find that the crime-fraud exception to the attorney-client privilege would apply. Because the application seeks attorney-client privileged information as to which no exception applies, granting the application would violate 28 U.S.C. § 1782 and constitute an undue burden under the discretionary factors listed by the Supreme Court. Therefore, Petitioner Palantirs application is DENIED.(cmadr, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Palantir Technologies Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?