Jones v. Reventics, LLC
| Daniel Jones |
| Reventics, LLC |
| 1:2023cv00602 |
| March 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Michael E Hegarty |
| Nina Y Wang |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 24 Civil Case Terminated pursuant to ECF #23 ORDER FOR CONSOLIDATION AND LEADERSHIP on 24 April 2023. Text Only Entry. (cmadr, ) |
Filing 23
ORDER FOR CONSOLIDATION AND LEADERSHIP by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 24 April 2023. The related actions of Paula Henderson v. Reventics, LLC., No. 1:23-cv-00586,Daniel Jones v. Reventics, LLC., No. 1:23-cv-00602, Carol Goldberg, Vahram Haroutunian, and Brian Kearney v. Reventics LLC., No. 1:23-cv-00641, Hilda Lopez v. Reventics, LLC., No. 1:23-cv-00655, Preference Robinson v. Reventics, LLC., No. 1:23-cv-00659 are hereby consolidated under Fed. R. Civ. P. 42(a)(2)into the lowest case number of 1:23-cv-00586, Paula Henderson v. Reventics, LLC., and assigned to the Hon. Michael E. Hegarty. Any existing case management and scheduling deadlines in the Related Actions shall be vacated, and the clerk directed to close Case Nos. 1:23-cv-00602-NYW-STV,1:23-cv-00641-NRN; 1:23-cv-00655-DDD-MEH and 1:23-cv-00659-RMR-MEH. (cmadr, )
|
| Filing 22 NOTICE AMENDED NOTICE OF RELATED CASES by Defendant Reventics, LLC (Ross, David) |
|
Filing 21
ORDER granting #19 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension. Defendant shall respond to Plaintiffs Complaint not later than May 5, 2023. SO ORDERED, by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 4/21/23. Text Only Entry(stvlc3, Andrew)
|
| Filing 20 MEMORANDUM regarding #19 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond filed by Reventics, LLC. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 4/21/2023. Text Only Entry (nywlc3, ) |
| Filing 19 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond by Defendant Reventics, LLC. (Viergever, Kimberly) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Kimberly A. Viergever on behalf of Reventics, LLCAttorney Kimberly A. Viergever added to party Reventics, LLC(pty:dft) (Viergever, Kimberly) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by David Mitchell Ross, Jr on behalf of Reventics, LLCAttorney David Mitchell Ross, Jr added to party Reventics, LLC(pty:dft) (Ross, David) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Ryan A. Williams on behalf of Reventics, LLCAttorney Ryan A. Williams added to party Reventics, LLC(pty:dft) (Williams, Ryan) |
|
Filing 15
MINUTE ORDER: This matter is before the Court sua sponte. In light of Plaintiff's #14 Notice of Filing of a Motion to Consolidate, the Scheduling Conference set for 6/14/2023 at 9:45 AM in Courtroom A 402 before Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak is CONVERTED to a Status Conference at the same date and time. The deadline to file a joint proposed scheduling order is VACATED. SO ORDERED, by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 4/13/23. Text Only Entry (stvlc3, Andrew)
|
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Filing of a Motion to Consolidate by Plaintiff Daniel Jones (Krzeski, Philip) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 04/11/2023. IT IS ORDERED: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and Local Civil Rule 16.1, the Court shall hold a scheduling conference on: June 14, 2023 at 9:45 AM. in Courtroom A-402, Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. On or before June 7, 2023, the parties shall file a joint proposed scheduling order in the form required pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2. (alave, )
|
|
Filing 12
MINUTE ORDER: The Court finds #11 Plaintiff's Response to Order to Show Cause sufficient at this stage of the proceedings to satisfy the Court of its subject matter jurisdiction over this lawsuit. Although Defendant Reventics, LLC is not, as the Response suggests, a corporation whose citizenship is determined by reference to 28 U.S.C. 1332(c)(1), the standard governing the citizenship of unincorporated associations like Defendant for the purposes of class actions under 28 U.S.C. 1332(d)(10) is substantively identical. See Ferrell v. Advance Am., Cash Advance Centers of S.C., Inc., No. CV 3:08-3996-MJP, 2009 WL 10701989, at *4-5 (D.S.C. May 28, 2009), aff'd 591 F.3d 698 (4th Cir. 2010). Accordingly, #6 Order to Show Cause is DISCHARGED. SO ORDERED, by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 4/11/23. Text Only Entry (stvlc3, Andrew)
|
| Filing 11 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re #6 by Plaintiff Daniel JonesAttorney Philip Joseph Krzeski added to party Daniel Jones(pty:pla). (Krzeski, Philip) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF RELATED CASES by Defendant Reventics, LLC (Barnes, Aurora) |
| Filing 9 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Answer or Respond to the Complaint by Defendant Reventics, LLC. Reventics, LLC answer due 4/21/2023. (Barnes, Aurora) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Joseph Michael Lyon on behalf of Daniel JonesAttorney Joseph Michael Lyon added to party Daniel Jones(pty:pla) (Lyon, Joseph) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Daniel Jones. Reventics, LLC served on 3/10/2023, answer due 3/31/2023. (Bleichner, Bryan) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 10 March 2023. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that, on or before April 10, 2023, Plaintiff shall show cause, if any there be, in writing, why this case should not be dismissed due to the Courts lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (cmadr, )
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER REFERRING CASE: This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak for non-dispositive matters. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, and (4) conduct a pretrial conference and enter a pretrial order. Court-sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the Magistrate Judge or on the request of the parties by motion, this Court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. Counsel for the Parties and all counsel who may later enter an appearance shall review and familiarize themselves with the undersigned's Practice Standards, as well as the Practice Standards of the assigned Magistrate Judge. By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 3/10/2023. Text Only Entry (nywlc3, )
|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (norlin, ) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Judge Nina Y. Wang and drawn to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. Text Only Entry (norlin, ) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS REQUEST as to Reventics, LLC re #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Daniel Jones. (Bleichner, Bryan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Reventics, LLC (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number ACODC-8978511)Attorney Bryan L. Bleichner added to party Daniel Jones(pty:pla), filed by Daniel Jones. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Bleichner, Bryan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
