Doe v. Tysk
| Jane Doe |
| Joseph G. Tysk |
| Jane Doe |
| Joseph G. Tysk |
| 1:2024cv01720 |
| June 20, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Maritza Dominguez Braswell |
| Regina M Rodriguez |
| Assault Libel & Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
ORDER REFERRING MOTION: #13 MOTION to Dismiss MOTION for More Definite Statement filed by Jane Doe. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell by Judge Regina M. Rodriguez on 8/16/24. Text Only Entry (kmyha)
|
|
Filing 17
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of Local Civ. R. 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions, and (5) pursuant to Local Civ. R. 16.6 and at the discretion of the Magistrate Judge, convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. SO ORDERED by Judge Regina M. Rodriguez on 8/16/2024. Text Only Entry (kmyha)
|
| Filing 16 CASE REASSIGNED Pursuant to #15 Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. All parties do not consent. Case randomly reassigned to Judge Regina M. Rodriguez and drawn to Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell. All future pleadings should be designated as 24-cv-01720-RMR. (Text Only Entry) (jrobe, ) |
| Filing 15 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Counter Defendant Jane Doe, Plaintiff Jane Doe All parties do not consent.. (Mahoney, Allison) |
| Filing 14 BRIEF in Support of #13 MOTION to Dismiss MOTION for More Definite Statement filed by Counter Defendant Jane Doe, Plaintiff Jane Doe. (Mahoney, Allison) |
| Filing 13 MOTION to Dismiss , MOTION for More Definite Statement by Counter Defendant Jane Doe, Plaintiff Jane Doe. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Mahoney, Allison) |
|
Filing 12
MINUTE ORDER: granting #9 Unopposed Motion to Proceed Under a Pseudonym. Pursuant to Colorado law, Plaintiff is permitted to proceed using a pseudonym, and the court may exclude or redact from all pleadings and documents filed in the action other identifying characteristics of the plaintiff[.] C.R.S. 13-21-1405(1)(a),(b); see also 15 U.S.C. 6851(b)(3)(B) (stating, "court may grant injunctive relief maintaining the confidentiality of a plaintiff using a pseudonym."). The parties are directed to redact from all pleadings and documents filed in the action other identifying characteristics of Plaintiff. By Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell on 08/05/2024. Text Only Entry(mdblc4,)
|
| Filing 11 Verified ANSWER to #1 Complaint , COUNTERCLAIM against Jane Doe by Joseph G. Tysk. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit)(Lintner, Andrew) |
| Filing 10 BRIEF in Support of #9 Unopposed MOTION for Leave to Proceed Under a Pseudonym filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Jane Doe, #2 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Mahoney, Allison) |
| Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Leave to Proceed Under a Pseudonym by Plaintiff Jane Doe. (Mahoney, Allison) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Gabriel Montalvo on behalf of All Defendants Attorney Gabriel Montalvo added to party Joseph G. Tysk(pty:dft) (Montalvo, Gabriel) |
|
Filing 7
MINUTE ORDER: granting Defendant's #6 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. Defendant's deadline to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is extended to July 31, 2024. By Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell on 07/12/2024. Text Only Entry(mdblc4,)
|
| Filing 6 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint, #5 Summons Returned Executed, #3 Summons Issued , First MOTION for Order to file Answer or otherwise respond on or before July 31, 2024 by Defendant Joseph G. Tysk. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Lintner, Andrew) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jane Doe. Joseph G. Tysk served on 6/26/2024, answer due 7/17/2024. (Mahoney, Allison) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER SETTING INITIAL CASE DEADLINES. Consent Form due by 8/19/2024. Proposed Scheduling Order due 8/19/2024. By Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell on 6/25/2024. (evaug)
|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (efoga, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell. Text Only Entry (efoga, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Joseph G. Tysk (Filing fee $ 405,Receipt Number ACODC-9740112)Attorney Allison L. Mahoney added to party Jane Doe(pty:pla), filed by Jane Doe. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Mahoney, Allison) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
