Michenzie v. Heartland Financial USA, Inc. et al
| Mary Michenzie |
| Christopher S. Hylen, Bruce K. Lee, Susan G. Murphy, John K. Schmidt, Duane E. White, Heartland Financial USA, Inc., Kathryn Graves Unger, Martin J. Schmitz, Margaret Lazo, Robert B. Engel, Thomas L. Flynn, Jennifer K. Hopkins and Opal G. Perry |
| 1:2024cv01741 |
| June 21, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Gordon P Gallagher |
| Michael E Hegarty |
| Securities, Commodities, Exchange |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 78 Securities Exchange Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Civil Case Terminated pursuant to the #6 notice of dismissal filed in this case on 08/06/2024. Text Only Entry (blaws) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal of Case by Plaintiff Mary Michenzie (Ackerman, Marc) |
Filing 5
MINUTE ORDER: On June 21, 2024, District Judge Gordon P. Gallagher referred the above-captioned case to Chief Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. ECF 4 . Proposed Scheduling Order due 8/14/2024. Scheduling Conference set for 8/21/2024 10:30 AM in Courtroom A 501 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff shall notify all Parties who have not entered an appearance of the date and time of the Scheduling Conference. Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 6/24/2024. (dgumb, )
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER REFERRING CASE to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other specifically-referred motions, and (4) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions. Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the parties by motion, this court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. SO ORDERED by District Judge Gordon P Gallagher on 6/21/2024. Text Only Entry (angar, )
|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (efoga, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to District Judge Gordon P Gallagher and drawn to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Text Only Entry (efoga, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Robert B. Engel, Thomas L. Flynn, Kathryn Graves Unger, Heartland Financial USA, Inc., Jennifer K. Hopkins, Christopher S. Hylen, Margaret Lazo, Bruce K. Lee, Susan G. Murphy, Opal G. Perry, John K. Schmidt, Martin J. Schmitz, Duane E. White (Filing fee $ 405,Receipt Number ACODC-9743083)Attorney Marc L. Ackerman added to party Mary Michenzie(pty:pla), filed by Mary Michenzie. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit R. 7.1 Disclosure Statement, #3 Summons Summons Request)(Ackerman, Marc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
