Kirschenbaum v. De Baets et al
| Jason Kirschenbaum |
| Stephane De Baets, Elevated Returns, LLC, 315 East Dean Associates, Inc. and Aspen Digital, Inc. |
| 1:2024cv01950 |
| July 15, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Kathryn A Starnella |
| Charlotte N Sweeney |
| Securities, Commodities, Exchange |
| 15 U.S.C. § 78 Securities Exchange Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Plaintiff Jason Kirschenbaum All parties do not consent.. (Hudgens, Benjamin) |
Filing 15
Minute ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella on 27 August 2024. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendants' Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Complaint #9 is GRANTED. The deadline for all Defendants to answer or otherwise respond to the operative complaint is October 2, 2024.(cmadr, )
|
| Filing 14 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Jason Kirschenbaum. Stephane De Baets waiver sent on 8/26/2024, answer due 10/25/2024. (Hudgens, Benjamin) |
| Filing 13 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Jason Kirschenbaum. Elevated Returns, LLC waiver sent on 8/26/2024, answer due 10/25/2024. (Hudgens, Benjamin) |
| Filing 12 MEMORANDUM regarding #9 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond. Motion #9 is referred to Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella, by Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney on 8/26/2024. Text Only Entry (cnsja, ) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Macklin Joseph Henderson on behalf of All Defendants Attorney Macklin Joseph Henderson added to party 315 East Dean Associates, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Macklin Joseph Henderson added to party Aspen Digital, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Macklin Joseph Henderson added to party Stephane De Baets(pty:dft), Attorney Macklin Joseph Henderson added to party Elevated Returns, LLC(pty:dft) (Henderson, Macklin) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF CASE ASSOCIATION by Christopher David Bryan on behalf of All Defendants (Bryan, Christopher) |
| Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond by Defendants 315 East Dean Associates, Inc., Aspen Digital, Inc., Stephane De Baets, Elevated Returns, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Bryan, Christopher) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Christopher David Bryan on behalf of All Defendants Attorney Christopher David Bryan added to party 315 East Dean Associates, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Christopher David Bryan added to party Aspen Digital, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Christopher David Bryan added to party Stephane De Baets(pty:dft), Attorney Christopher David Bryan added to party Elevated Returns, LLC(pty:dft) (Bryan, Christopher) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jason Kirschenbaum. Aspen Digital, Inc. served on 8/12/2024, answer due 9/3/2024. (Hudgens, Benjamin) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jason Kirschenbaum. 315 East Dean Associates, Inc. served on 8/7/2024, answer due 8/28/2024. (Hudgens, Benjamin) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING/PLANNING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella on 17 July 2024. Proposed Scheduling Order due 11/5/2024. Scheduling Conference set for 11/12/2024 10:00 AM in Courtroom C204 before Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella. (Attachments: #1 Continuation of Main Document, #2 Continuation of Main Document, #3 Continuation of Main Document) (cmadr, )
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella for non-dispositive matters. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of Local Civ. R. 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) pursuant to Local Civ. R. 16.6 and at the discretion of the Magistrate Judge, convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. By Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney on 7/15/24. Text Only Entry (jdyne)
|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (ykare, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney and drawn to Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella. Text Only Entry (ykare, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Demand for Jury Trial against 315 East Dean Associates, Inc., Aspen Digital, Inc., Stephane De Baets, Elevated Returns, LLC (Filing fee $ 405,Receipt Number ACODC-9774220)Attorney Benjamin Warren Hudgens added to party Jason Kirschenbaum(pty:pla), filed by Jason Kirschenbaum. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Summons to Defendant 315 East Dean Associates, Inc., #12 Summons to Defendant Aspen Digital, Inc., #13 Summons to Defendant Stephane De Baets, #14 Summons to Defendant Elevated Returns, LLC, #15 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hudgens, Benjamin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
