Jung v. Goldman et al
Jonathan Michael Jung |
Antony Blinken and Michael Goldman |
1:2024cv02500 |
September 11, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
Susan Prose |
APA Review/Appeal |
05 U.S.C. ยง 0706 - Judicial Review of Agency Action |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (norlin, ) |
Filing 6 CASE REASSIGNED. Case randomly reassigned to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose. Judge Robert E. Blackburn no longer assigned to the case. All future pleadings should be designated as 24-cv-2500-SBP. (Text Only Entry) (norlin, ) |
![]() |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed upon defendant(s) Antony Blinken served on 9/16/2024, answer due 11/15/2024; Michael Goldman served on 9/16/2024, answer due 11/15/2024. (Goldstein, Joshua) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (agryan) |
Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Robert E. Blackburn. Text Only Entry. (agryan) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS against Antony Blinken, Michael Goldman (Filing fee $ 405,Receipt Number ACODC-9866091)Attorney Joshua L. Goldstein added to party Jonathan Michael Jung(pty:pla), filed by Jonathan Michael Jung. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Goldstein, Joshua) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.