Davis (PS) v. Value Plus
| Lamar Delray Davis |
| Value Plus |
| 1:2024cv02768 |
| October 7, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Lewis T Babcock |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. not a defendant) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 JUDGMENT by Clerk re: #7 Order of Dismissal on 11/19/2024. (ccuen, ) |
Filing 7
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for the failure of Plaintiff, Lamar Delray Davis, to cure a filing deficiency as directed in the October 8, 2024 Order. The Prisoner's Motions and Affidavits for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 (ECF Nos. #3 , #4 , and #5 ) are denied as moot. IFP on appeal is denied without prejudice. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. If Mr. Davis files a notice of appeal he must also pay the full $505 appellate filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit within thirty days in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 24, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 11/19/2024. (ccuen, )
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO CURE DEFICIENCY. Mr. Davis cure the deficiency by filing a certified copy of his inmate account statement showing account activity for the six months immediately preceding his filing of this action within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. Any papers that Mr. Davis files in response to this Order must include the civil action number on this Order. If Mr. Davis fails to cure the designated deficiency within the time allowed the action will be dismissed without further notice, by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 10/8/2024. (ccuen, )
|
| Filing 5 Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915, by Plaintiff Lamar Delray Davis. (sadhi, ) |
| Filing 4 Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915, by Plaintiff Lamar Delray Davis. (sadhi, ) |
| Filing 3 Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915, by Plaintiff Lamar Delray Davis. (sadhi, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Richard T Gurley. Text Only Entry (sadhi, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Value Plus, filed by Lamar Delray Davis. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope)(sadhi, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Davis (PS) v. Value Plus | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Lamar Delray Davis | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Value Plus | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
