Oakes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Chelsea Oakes |
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company |
1:2024cv02994 |
October 25, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
S Kato Crews |
Michael E Hegarty |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 19 COURTROOM MINUTES for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty: Scheduling Conference held on 12/3/2024.FTR: A501. (cthom, ) |
![]() |
Filing 17 Proposed Scheduling Order by Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (Anderson, Sheryl) |
Filing 16 CASE REASSIGNED. Pursuant to #14 Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. This case is randomly reassigned to Judge S. Kato Crews and drawn to Chief Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. All parties do not consent. All future pleadings should be designated as 24-cv-2994-SKC. (Text Only Entry) (dgumb, ) |
![]() |
Filing 14 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company All parties do not consent.. (Anderson, Sheryl) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance of Shannon VanMatre by Steven Michael Bonjour on behalf of Chelsea Oakes (Bonjour, Steven) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Robert Alan Zahradnik-Mitchell on behalf of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyAttorney Robert Alan Zahradnik-Mitchell added to party State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company(pty:dft) (Zahradnik-Mitchell, Robert) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance of Steven M. Bonjour by Steven Michael Bonjour on behalf of Chelsea OakesAttorney Steven Michael Bonjour added to party Chelsea Oakes(pty:pla) (Bonjour, Steven) |
Filing 10 ANSWER to #4 Complaint by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company.(Anderson, Sheryl) |
![]() |
Filing 8 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (efoga, ) |
Filing 7 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Text Only Entry (efoga, ) |
Filing 6 STATE COURT ORDER Granting Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint to and Including October 30, 2024. By District Court Judge, Arapahoe County on 10/18/2024. (efoga, ) |
Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT/RETURN of Service of Summons, Cover Sheet, and Complaint upon State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company on 9/25/2024 (efoga, ) |
Filing 4 COMPLAINT against State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, filed by Chelsea Oakes.(efoga, ) |
Filing 3 ADMINISTRATIVE REMINDER to Filer. It is the responsibility of the attorney or pro se party removing the case to follow Local Rule D.C.COLO.LCivR 81.1 and 28 U.S.C. Section 1446a when filing a Notice of Removal. (Text only entry.) (efoga, ) |
Filing 2 FIRST AND FINAL NOTICE TO ALL ATTORNEY(S) AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES IN REMOVED, TRANSFERRED, OR OTHER CASES. To receive any further notice in a case removed or transferred to this court, or special matters including discovery disputes, bankruptcy appeals, or withdrawals of reference, Multi-district litigation (MDL), etc., all attorneys and unrepresented parties must enter an appearance under D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(a). An attorney must be an active member of this court's bar and be in good standing in accordance with D.C.COLO.LAttyR 3. A waiver of the fee for bar admission may apply in limited situations. (Text Only Entry) (efoga, ) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company from Arapahoe County District Court, Case Number 2024CV32079. (Filing fee $ 405, Receipt Number BCODC-9951742), filed by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint (Jury not demanded or paid for), #2 Exhibit B - Affidavit of Service - State Farm served 09-25-24, #3 Exhibit C - Voter Registration- Chelsea Oakes, #4 Exhibit D - Certificate of Fact of Good Standing, #5 Exhibit E - Articles of Incorporation-State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co, #6 Exhibit F - Corporate Disclosure Statement, #7 Exhibit G - Civil Case Cover Sheet (NOT 16.1), #8 Exhibit H - Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint, #9 Exhibit I - Order Granting Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint, #10 Civil Cover Sheet, #11 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet)(Anderson, Sheryl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Oakes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Chelsea Oakes | |
Represented By: | Steven Michael Bonjour |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | |
Represented By: | Robert Alan Zahradnik-Mitchell |
Represented By: | Sheryl Lynn Anderson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.