Rojas-Martinez v. Noem et al
Catalina Rojas-Martinez |
Kristi Noem, Kika Scott, David Douglas and Andrew Lambrecht |
1:2025cv00499 |
February 15, 2025 |
U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
Robert E Blackburn |
APA Review/Appeal |
05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Alicia Megan Alvero Koski on behalf of Kristi Noem, Kika Scott, David Douglas, Andrew LambrechtAttorney Alicia Megan Alvero Koski added to party Kristi Noem(pty:dft), Attorney Alicia Megan Alvero Koski added to party Kika Scott(pty:dft), Attorney Alicia Megan Alvero Koski added to party David Douglas(pty:dft), Attorney Alicia Megan Alvero Koski added to party Andrew Lambrecht(pty:dft) (Alvero Koski, Alicia) |
![]() |
Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (sadhi, ) |
Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Robert E. Blackburn. Text Only Entry. (sadhi, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against David Douglas, Andrew Lambrecht, Kristi Noem, Kika Scott (Filing fee $ 405,Receipt Number ACODC-10156765)Attorney Fred R. Hartman added to party Catalina Rojas-Martinez(pty:pla), filed by Catalina Rojas-Martinez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons for Kristi Noem, #3 Summons for Kika Scott, #4 Summons for David Douglas, #5 Summons for Andrew Lambrecht)(Hartman, Fred) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.