Black v. Emerson

Black v. Emerson

Case Number:	1:2025cv01035
Filed:	June 9, 2025
Court:	U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado
Office:	Denver Office
Nature of Suit:	Arbitration
Cause of Action:	09 U.S.C. § 0007 - Petition to Compel Attendance Before Arbitrator

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 9, 2025	Filing 25 ORDER ON PETITIONER LEON BLACK'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO RESTRICT (ECF No. 21) AND RESPONDENT RICHARD EMERSON'S RENEWED MOTION TO MOTION TO RESTRICT CASE (ECF No. 22) Mr. Blacks original Motion to Seal the Proceeding, ECF No. 2 , and Unopposed Motion to Restrict, ECF No. 21 , are DENIED. Mr. Emersons more limited Motion to Restrict Case, ECF No. 22 , is GRANTED. Once this Order becomes effective, the Clerk is ORDERED to unrestrict all filings in this case, except for ECF Nos. 11-2 , 11-4, 11-6, 11-7, 11-8, 11-9, 11-10, 16-2, and 16-3, which shall remain under restriction Level 1 (access available to the Parties and the Court). Within three business days from the date this Order becomes effective, Mr. Emerson shall fil e on the public docket redacted versions of the three exhibits he suggests can be made public with limited redactions: ECF Nos. 11- 4,11-6, and 11-7. STAY OF ORDER This Order is STAYED for three business days for Mr. Bla ck to decide whether to object to Judge Martinez. If, within those three days, Mr. Black files a notice of his intention to object to this Order, then the Order will remain stayed until Judge Martinez rules on any objection. If no notice (not the f ormal objection itself, just a notice of intent to object) is filed within the next three days, then the stay will expire by the terms of this Order, this Order shall become effective, and the restrictions on public access to the filings in this case shall be lifted as described above. By Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter on 6/9/2025.(norlin, )

Date Filed

Document Text

June 9, 2025

Filing 25 ORDER ON PETITIONER LEON BLACK'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO RESTRICT (ECF No. 21) AND RESPONDENT RICHARD EMERSON'S RENEWED MOTION TO MOTION TO RESTRICT CASE (ECF No. 22) Mr. Blacks original Motion to Seal the Proceeding, ECF No. 2 , and Unopposed Motion to Restrict, ECF No. 21 , are DENIED. Mr. Emersons more limited Motion to Restrict Case, ECF No. 22 , is GRANTED. Once this Order becomes effective, the Clerk is ORDERED to unrestrict all filings in this case, except for ECF Nos. 11-2 , 11-4, 11-6, 11-7, 11-8, 11-9, 11-10, 16-2, and 16-3, which shall remain under restriction Level 1 (access available to the Parties and the Court). Within three business days from the date this Order becomes effective, Mr. Emerson shall fil e on the public docket redacted versions of the three exhibits he suggests can be made public with limited redactions: ECF Nos. 11- 4,11-6, and 11-7. STAY OF ORDER This Order is STAYED for three business days for Mr. Bla ck to decide whether to object to Judge Martinez. If, within those three days, Mr. Black files a notice of his intention to object to this Order, then the Order will remain stayed until Judge Martinez rules on any objection. If no notice (not the f ormal objection itself, just a notice of intent to object) is filed within the next three days, then the stay will expire by the terms of this Order, this Order shall become effective, and the restrictions on public access to the filings in this case shall be lifted as described above. By Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter on 6/9/2025.(norlin, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Black v. Emerson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?