Carter v. Wolf et al
| 3:2006cv01351 |
| August 30, 2006 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| Alvin W. Thompson |
| Contract: Other |
| No cause code entered |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
256
ORDER granting in part 242 Motion for Cost and Fees. See attached ruling. Signed by Judge Holly B. Fitzsimmons on 5/8/2013. (Garcia, M.)
|
|
Filing
240
BENCH RULING/FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW. The Clerk of the Court will enter judgment in accordance with this Ruling. Signed by Judge Holly B. Fitzsimmons on 9/28/2012. (Garcia, M.)
|
|
Filing
127
ORDER: The defendant's motion 112 to quash the notices of deposition is granted and the defendant's motion 111 for a protective order prohibiting the depositions is denied. See attached ruling. Signed by Judge Donna F. Martinez on 1/8/10. (Constantine, A.)
|
|
Filing
117
ORDER : A settlement conference is scheduled for 1/6/10 at 1:00 p.m. with Judge Martinez, Room 262, U.S. District Court, 450 Main Street, Hartford. See attached order for instructions. (Constantine, A.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Carter v. Wolf et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
