Pappas v. Enfield et al
| Margaret R. Pappas |
| Town of Enfield, Planning And Zoning Commission, Anthony DiPace, Jeffrey D. Cooper, James A. Hickey, Jr. and Karen Weseliza |
| 3:2008cv00250 |
| February 15, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| Hartford |
| Vanessa L. Bryant |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
103
ORDER (see attached) granting 74 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. The Clerk is directed to close the file. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on 5/07/2014. (Wang, S)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER (see attached) denying 52 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on July 20, 2010. (Lacedonia, J.)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER (see attached) granting in part and denying in part 31 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff's substantive due process claim is dismissed with prejudice. Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's equal protection claim is denied. Plaintiff's claim for taking of property is dismissed without prejudice. Notwithstanding the scheduling order of May 13, 2009, the parties are directed to confer and file on or before February 19, 2010 a joint proposal as to reasonable deadlines for completing discovery on the remaining claim and filing dispositive motions, or, if none are filed, a trial ready date.Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on February 3, 2010.(Lacedonia, J.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
