Aquart v. Jacobowski et al
| Azibo Aquart |
| Sue Jacobowski and B Senecal |
| 3:2008cv01562 |
| October 10, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| New Haven |
| Vanessa L. Bryant |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
52
ORDER denying 47 Motion to Compel; denying 47 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; denying 48 Motion to Compel; denying 48 Motion to Appoint Counsel; and denying 49 Motion for Reconsideration. See attached memorandum of decision. This order enters summary judgment in favor of the defendants. The clerk is, therefore directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on September 25, 2012. (Butler, Ayanna)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER Granting Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment for Defendant 45 . The plaintiff is ordered to respond within 21 days of the entry of this order. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of this case on September 12, 2012. See attached memorandum of decision. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on August 21, 2012. (Butler, Ayanna)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 32 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 39 Motion for Leave to File. See attached memorandum of decision. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on March 30, 2012. (Butler, Ayanna)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 13 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 7/30/10. (Corriette, M.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
